TY - JOUR
T1 - Screening for Food Insecurity
T2 - US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
AU - US Preventive Services Task Force
AU - Nicholson, Wanda K.
AU - Silverstein, Michael
AU - Wong, John B.
AU - Chelmow, David
AU - Coker, Tumaini Rucker
AU - Fernandez, Alicia
AU - Gibson, Ericka
AU - Jaen, Carlos R
AU - Krousel-Wood, Marie
AU - Lee, Sei
AU - Rao, Goutham
AU - Ruiz, John M.
AU - Stevermer, James
AU - Tsevat, Joel
AU - Underwood, Sandra Millon
AU - Wiehe, Sarah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Medical Association.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Importance: According to survey data, 12.8% of households experienced food insecurity in 2022, with 7.7% of households experiencing low food security and 5.1% experiencing very low food security. Nearly one-third of households with incomes below the federal poverty threshold are food insecure. Food insecurity is one among a multitude of medical, psychological, and social conditions common among economically disadvantaged households. Objective: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for food insecurity in the health care setting. Population: Children, adolescents, and adults. Evidence Assessment: The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient and the balance of benefits and harms for screening for food insecurity on health outcomes in the primary care setting cannot be determined. Recommendation: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for food insecurity on health outcomes in the primary care setting. (I statement).
AB - Importance: According to survey data, 12.8% of households experienced food insecurity in 2022, with 7.7% of households experiencing low food security and 5.1% experiencing very low food security. Nearly one-third of households with incomes below the federal poverty threshold are food insecure. Food insecurity is one among a multitude of medical, psychological, and social conditions common among economically disadvantaged households. Objective: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for food insecurity in the health care setting. Population: Children, adolescents, and adults. Evidence Assessment: The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient and the balance of benefits and harms for screening for food insecurity on health outcomes in the primary care setting cannot be determined. Recommendation: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for food insecurity on health outcomes in the primary care setting. (I statement).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001589798&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105001589798&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jama.2025.0879
DO - 10.1001/jama.2025.0879
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40067285
AN - SCOPUS:105001589798
SN - 0098-7484
JO - JAMA
JF - JAMA
ER -