Screening for carcinoma of the prostate: Efficacy of available screening tests

Ian M. Thompson, William R. Fair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the high prevalence and mortality from carcinoma of the prostate, very few prospective, controlled, population-based studies are available to assess the impact of early diagnosis programs. Three screening modalities have been suggested for this tumor : rectal examination, serum tumor markers, and transrectal ultrasound. Prostatic acid phosphatase and prostatic specific antigen have proven to be insensitive and nonspecific in large trials and generally, when elevated, allow diagnosis of metastatic disease. Transrectal ultrasound also suffers from poor specificity. Rectal examination, although insensitive to small tumors (less than 1 ml in volume), has the advantage of possibly detecting tumors of a higher biologic activity. An improved survival has been demonstrated in populations undergoing routine rectal examinations. Further prospective, population-based trials comparing early detection techniques are necessary before mass screening for carcinoma of the prostate can be recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-70
Number of pages6
JournalWorld Journal of Surgery
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostate
Carcinoma
Population
Mass Screening
Rectal Neoplasms
Tumor Biomarkers
Early Diagnosis
Neoplasms
Biomarkers
Antigens
Mortality
prostatic acid phosphatase

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Screening for carcinoma of the prostate : Efficacy of available screening tests. / Thompson, Ian M.; Fair, William R.

In: World Journal of Surgery, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.1989, p. 65-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thompson, Ian M. ; Fair, William R. / Screening for carcinoma of the prostate : Efficacy of available screening tests. In: World Journal of Surgery. 1989 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 65-70.
@article{3da7ac58a41f4eee981eeb45b7afb894,
title = "Screening for carcinoma of the prostate: Efficacy of available screening tests",
abstract = "Despite the high prevalence and mortality from carcinoma of the prostate, very few prospective, controlled, population-based studies are available to assess the impact of early diagnosis programs. Three screening modalities have been suggested for this tumor : rectal examination, serum tumor markers, and transrectal ultrasound. Prostatic acid phosphatase and prostatic specific antigen have proven to be insensitive and nonspecific in large trials and generally, when elevated, allow diagnosis of metastatic disease. Transrectal ultrasound also suffers from poor specificity. Rectal examination, although insensitive to small tumors (less than 1 ml in volume), has the advantage of possibly detecting tumors of a higher biologic activity. An improved survival has been demonstrated in populations undergoing routine rectal examinations. Further prospective, population-based trials comparing early detection techniques are necessary before mass screening for carcinoma of the prostate can be recommended.",
author = "Thompson, {Ian M.} and Fair, {William R.}",
year = "1989",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF01671156",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "65--70",
journal = "World Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0364-2313",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Screening for carcinoma of the prostate

T2 - Efficacy of available screening tests

AU - Thompson, Ian M.

AU - Fair, William R.

PY - 1989/1

Y1 - 1989/1

N2 - Despite the high prevalence and mortality from carcinoma of the prostate, very few prospective, controlled, population-based studies are available to assess the impact of early diagnosis programs. Three screening modalities have been suggested for this tumor : rectal examination, serum tumor markers, and transrectal ultrasound. Prostatic acid phosphatase and prostatic specific antigen have proven to be insensitive and nonspecific in large trials and generally, when elevated, allow diagnosis of metastatic disease. Transrectal ultrasound also suffers from poor specificity. Rectal examination, although insensitive to small tumors (less than 1 ml in volume), has the advantage of possibly detecting tumors of a higher biologic activity. An improved survival has been demonstrated in populations undergoing routine rectal examinations. Further prospective, population-based trials comparing early detection techniques are necessary before mass screening for carcinoma of the prostate can be recommended.

AB - Despite the high prevalence and mortality from carcinoma of the prostate, very few prospective, controlled, population-based studies are available to assess the impact of early diagnosis programs. Three screening modalities have been suggested for this tumor : rectal examination, serum tumor markers, and transrectal ultrasound. Prostatic acid phosphatase and prostatic specific antigen have proven to be insensitive and nonspecific in large trials and generally, when elevated, allow diagnosis of metastatic disease. Transrectal ultrasound also suffers from poor specificity. Rectal examination, although insensitive to small tumors (less than 1 ml in volume), has the advantage of possibly detecting tumors of a higher biologic activity. An improved survival has been demonstrated in populations undergoing routine rectal examinations. Further prospective, population-based trials comparing early detection techniques are necessary before mass screening for carcinoma of the prostate can be recommended.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024571641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024571641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01671156

DO - 10.1007/BF01671156

M3 - Article

C2 - 2658356

AN - SCOPUS:0024571641

VL - 13

SP - 65

EP - 70

JO - World Journal of Surgery

JF - World Journal of Surgery

SN - 0364-2313

IS - 1

ER -