Sacral fractures with neurological injury: Is early decompression beneficial?

B. A. Zelle, G. S. Gruen, T. Hunt, S. R. Speth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

66 Scopus citations

Abstract

During a 6-year period, 177 patients with a displaced sacral fracture were treated at our level-one trauma centre. At the initial presentation, 13 patients demonstrated a neurological deficit as a result of their sacral fracture. Six patients underwent surgical decompression, and seven patients were managed without surgical decompression. All patients were re-assessed at an average follow-up of 27.1 (range 12-84) months using the modified SOFCOT Index and the S17-36. Patients undergoing surgical decompression had a significantly better neurological improvement as measured by the modified SOFCOT Index (p=0.014). Moreover, patients undergoing surgical decompression had a significantly better physical function than the patients that were managed without surgical decompression, as measured by the SF-36 (p=0.044). We therefore believe that patients undergoing surgical decompression achieve better neurological improvement and better functional results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)244-251
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Orthopaedics
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2004
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sacral fractures with neurological injury: Is early decompression beneficial?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this