TY - JOUR
T1 - Rod photoresponse kinetics limit temporal contrast sensitivity in mesopic vision
AU - Umino, Yumiko
AU - Guo, Ying
AU - Chen, Ching Kang
AU - Pasquale, Rose
AU - Solessio, Eduardo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 the authors.
PY - 2019/4/17
Y1 - 2019/4/17
N2 - The mammalian visual system operates over an extended range of ambient light levels by switching between rod and cone photoreceptors. Rod-driven vision is sluggish, highly sensitive, and operates in dim or scotopic lights, whereas cone-driven vision is brisk, less sensitive, and operates in bright or photopic lights. At intermediate or mesopic lights, vision transitions seamlessly from rod-driven to cone-driven, despite the profound differences in rod and cone response dynamics. The neural mechanisms underlying such a smooth handoff are not understood. Using an operant behavior assay, electrophysiological recordings, and mathematical modeling we examined the neural underpinnings of the mesopic visual transition in mice of either sex.Wefound that rods, but not cones, drive visual sensitivity to temporal light variations overmuchof the mesopic range. Surprisingly, speeding up rod photoresponse recovery kinetics in transgenic mice improved visual sensitivity to slow temporal variations, in the range where perceptual sensitivity is governed by Weber’s law of sensation. In contrast, physiological processes acting downstream from phototransduction limit sensitivity to high frequencies and temporal resolution. We traced the paradoxical control of visual temporal sensitivity to rod photoresponses themselves. A scenario emerges where perceptual sensitivity is limited by: (1) the kinetics of neural processes acting downstream from phototransduction in scotopic lights, (2) rod response kinetics in mesopic lights, and (3) cone response kinetics as light levels rise into the photopic range.
AB - The mammalian visual system operates over an extended range of ambient light levels by switching between rod and cone photoreceptors. Rod-driven vision is sluggish, highly sensitive, and operates in dim or scotopic lights, whereas cone-driven vision is brisk, less sensitive, and operates in bright or photopic lights. At intermediate or mesopic lights, vision transitions seamlessly from rod-driven to cone-driven, despite the profound differences in rod and cone response dynamics. The neural mechanisms underlying such a smooth handoff are not understood. Using an operant behavior assay, electrophysiological recordings, and mathematical modeling we examined the neural underpinnings of the mesopic visual transition in mice of either sex.Wefound that rods, but not cones, drive visual sensitivity to temporal light variations overmuchof the mesopic range. Surprisingly, speeding up rod photoresponse recovery kinetics in transgenic mice improved visual sensitivity to slow temporal variations, in the range where perceptual sensitivity is governed by Weber’s law of sensation. In contrast, physiological processes acting downstream from phototransduction limit sensitivity to high frequencies and temporal resolution. We traced the paradoxical control of visual temporal sensitivity to rod photoresponses themselves. A scenario emerges where perceptual sensitivity is limited by: (1) the kinetics of neural processes acting downstream from phototransduction in scotopic lights, (2) rod response kinetics in mesopic lights, and (3) cone response kinetics as light levels rise into the photopic range.
KW - ERG
KW - Mesopic vision
KW - Mouse
KW - Operant behavior
KW - Temporal resolution
KW - Weber adaptation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065044606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065044606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1404-18.2019
DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1404-18.2019
M3 - Article
C2 - 30737308
AN - SCOPUS:85065044606
SN - 0270-6474
VL - 39
SP - 3041
EP - 3056
JO - Journal of Neuroscience
JF - Journal of Neuroscience
IS - 16
ER -