Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: History, techniques and outcomes

Michael A Liss, A. Karim Kader

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is a less invasive means of performing the radical cystectomy operation, which holds promise for improved patient morbidity. We review the history, technique and current literature pertaining to RARC and place the current results in context with the open procedure. Methods: All articles regarding RARC found in PubMed after January 2000 were examined. We selected articles that appeared in high-impact journals, had large patient population size (>80 patients), or were novel in technique or findings. We chose key laparoscopic articles to give reference to the history in transition to robotic radical cystectomy. In addition, we chose classic articles from open radical cystectomy to give reference regarding the newer robotic perioperative outcomes. Results: Studies suggest that a 20-patient learning curve is needed to reach an operative time of 6.5 h, with 30 surgeries performed to reach lymph node counts in excess of 20 (International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium). The only randomized surgical trial comparing open and robotic techniques showed equivalent lymph node yield, which may be surgeon and volume dependent. Literature demonstrates lower estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, early return of bowel function and decreased complications in early small series. Conclusion: RARC and urinary diversion are still early in development and limited to centers with extensive robotic experience and volume, although adoption of the robotic approach is becoming more common. Early studies have shown promise to reduce complications with equivalent oncologic results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)489-497
Number of pages9
JournalWorld Journal of Urology
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cystectomy
Robotics
History
Lymph Nodes
Urinary Diversion
Learning Curve
Operative Time
Population Density
PubMed
Blood Transfusion
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Bladder cancer
  • Cystectomy
  • Outcomes
  • Robotic radical cystectomy
  • Robotics
  • Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy : History, techniques and outcomes. / Liss, Michael A; Kader, A. Karim.

In: World Journal of Urology, Vol. 31, No. 3, 01.06.2013, p. 489-497.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{862c3eb38e5248ac9ae28335e883bd12,
title = "Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: History, techniques and outcomes",
abstract = "Objective: Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is a less invasive means of performing the radical cystectomy operation, which holds promise for improved patient morbidity. We review the history, technique and current literature pertaining to RARC and place the current results in context with the open procedure. Methods: All articles regarding RARC found in PubMed after January 2000 were examined. We selected articles that appeared in high-impact journals, had large patient population size (>80 patients), or were novel in technique or findings. We chose key laparoscopic articles to give reference to the history in transition to robotic radical cystectomy. In addition, we chose classic articles from open radical cystectomy to give reference regarding the newer robotic perioperative outcomes. Results: Studies suggest that a 20-patient learning curve is needed to reach an operative time of 6.5 h, with 30 surgeries performed to reach lymph node counts in excess of 20 (International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium). The only randomized surgical trial comparing open and robotic techniques showed equivalent lymph node yield, which may be surgeon and volume dependent. Literature demonstrates lower estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, early return of bowel function and decreased complications in early small series. Conclusion: RARC and urinary diversion are still early in development and limited to centers with extensive robotic experience and volume, although adoption of the robotic approach is becoming more common. Early studies have shown promise to reduce complications with equivalent oncologic results.",
keywords = "Bladder cancer, Cystectomy, Outcomes, Robotic radical cystectomy, Robotics, Technology",
author = "Liss, {Michael A} and Kader, {A. Karim}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00345-013-1053-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "489--497",
journal = "World Journal of Urology",
issn = "0724-4983",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy

T2 - History, techniques and outcomes

AU - Liss, Michael A

AU - Kader, A. Karim

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - Objective: Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is a less invasive means of performing the radical cystectomy operation, which holds promise for improved patient morbidity. We review the history, technique and current literature pertaining to RARC and place the current results in context with the open procedure. Methods: All articles regarding RARC found in PubMed after January 2000 were examined. We selected articles that appeared in high-impact journals, had large patient population size (>80 patients), or were novel in technique or findings. We chose key laparoscopic articles to give reference to the history in transition to robotic radical cystectomy. In addition, we chose classic articles from open radical cystectomy to give reference regarding the newer robotic perioperative outcomes. Results: Studies suggest that a 20-patient learning curve is needed to reach an operative time of 6.5 h, with 30 surgeries performed to reach lymph node counts in excess of 20 (International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium). The only randomized surgical trial comparing open and robotic techniques showed equivalent lymph node yield, which may be surgeon and volume dependent. Literature demonstrates lower estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, early return of bowel function and decreased complications in early small series. Conclusion: RARC and urinary diversion are still early in development and limited to centers with extensive robotic experience and volume, although adoption of the robotic approach is becoming more common. Early studies have shown promise to reduce complications with equivalent oncologic results.

AB - Objective: Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is a less invasive means of performing the radical cystectomy operation, which holds promise for improved patient morbidity. We review the history, technique and current literature pertaining to RARC and place the current results in context with the open procedure. Methods: All articles regarding RARC found in PubMed after January 2000 were examined. We selected articles that appeared in high-impact journals, had large patient population size (>80 patients), or were novel in technique or findings. We chose key laparoscopic articles to give reference to the history in transition to robotic radical cystectomy. In addition, we chose classic articles from open radical cystectomy to give reference regarding the newer robotic perioperative outcomes. Results: Studies suggest that a 20-patient learning curve is needed to reach an operative time of 6.5 h, with 30 surgeries performed to reach lymph node counts in excess of 20 (International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium). The only randomized surgical trial comparing open and robotic techniques showed equivalent lymph node yield, which may be surgeon and volume dependent. Literature demonstrates lower estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, early return of bowel function and decreased complications in early small series. Conclusion: RARC and urinary diversion are still early in development and limited to centers with extensive robotic experience and volume, although adoption of the robotic approach is becoming more common. Early studies have shown promise to reduce complications with equivalent oncologic results.

KW - Bladder cancer

KW - Cystectomy

KW - Outcomes

KW - Robotic radical cystectomy

KW - Robotics

KW - Technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878264481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878264481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00345-013-1053-z

DO - 10.1007/s00345-013-1053-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 23512230

AN - SCOPUS:84878264481

VL - 31

SP - 489

EP - 497

JO - World Journal of Urology

JF - World Journal of Urology

SN - 0724-4983

IS - 3

ER -