Rigid versus wire fixation for mandibular advancement: Skeletal and dental changes after 5 years

Calogero Dolce, John P. Hatch, Joseph E. Van Sickels, John D Rugh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is the most common surgical procedure for the correction of mandibular retrognathism. Commonly, the proximal and distal segments are fixated together with either wire or rigid screws or plates. The purpose of this study was to compare long-term (5 years) skeletal and dental changes between wire and rigid fixation after BSSO. In this multisite, prospective, randomized clinical trial, the rigid fixation group received three 2-mm bicortical position screws, and the wire fixation group received inferior border wires and 6 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with 24-gauge wires. Cephalometric films were obtained 2 weeks before surgery and at 1 week, 8 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years after surgery. Linear cephalometric changes were referenced to a cranial base coordinate system. Before surgery, both groups were comparable with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. Both groups underwent similar surgical changes. Skeletal and dental movements occurred in both groups throughout the study period. Five years after surgery, the wire group had 2.2 mm (42%) of sagittal skeletal relapse, while the rigid group remained unchanged from immediately postsurgery. Surprisingly, at 5 years, both groups had similar changes in overbite and overjet. This was attributed to dental changes in the maxillary and mandibular incisors. Although rigid fixation is more stable than wire fixation for maintaining the skeletal advancement after a BSSO, the incisor changes made the resultant occlusions of the 2 groups indistinguishable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)610-619
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume121
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Mandibular Advancement
Tooth
Osteotomy
Cephalometry
Fracture Fixation
Incisor
Jaw Fixation Techniques
Retrognathia
Overbite
Tooth Movement Techniques
Skull Base
Randomized Controlled Trials
Recurrence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Surgery

Cite this

Rigid versus wire fixation for mandibular advancement : Skeletal and dental changes after 5 years. / Dolce, Calogero; Hatch, John P.; Van Sickels, Joseph E.; Rugh, John D.

In: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Vol. 121, No. 6, 2002, p. 610-619.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{63791323ce7c4613adec95d305c14de3,
title = "Rigid versus wire fixation for mandibular advancement: Skeletal and dental changes after 5 years",
abstract = "The bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is the most common surgical procedure for the correction of mandibular retrognathism. Commonly, the proximal and distal segments are fixated together with either wire or rigid screws or plates. The purpose of this study was to compare long-term (5 years) skeletal and dental changes between wire and rigid fixation after BSSO. In this multisite, prospective, randomized clinical trial, the rigid fixation group received three 2-mm bicortical position screws, and the wire fixation group received inferior border wires and 6 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with 24-gauge wires. Cephalometric films were obtained 2 weeks before surgery and at 1 week, 8 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years after surgery. Linear cephalometric changes were referenced to a cranial base coordinate system. Before surgery, both groups were comparable with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. Both groups underwent similar surgical changes. Skeletal and dental movements occurred in both groups throughout the study period. Five years after surgery, the wire group had 2.2 mm (42{\%}) of sagittal skeletal relapse, while the rigid group remained unchanged from immediately postsurgery. Surprisingly, at 5 years, both groups had similar changes in overbite and overjet. This was attributed to dental changes in the maxillary and mandibular incisors. Although rigid fixation is more stable than wire fixation for maintaining the skeletal advancement after a BSSO, the incisor changes made the resultant occlusions of the 2 groups indistinguishable.",
author = "Calogero Dolce and Hatch, {John P.} and {Van Sickels}, {Joseph E.} and Rugh, {John D}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1067/mod.2002.123341",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "121",
pages = "610--619",
journal = "American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics",
issn = "0889-5406",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rigid versus wire fixation for mandibular advancement

T2 - Skeletal and dental changes after 5 years

AU - Dolce, Calogero

AU - Hatch, John P.

AU - Van Sickels, Joseph E.

AU - Rugh, John D

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is the most common surgical procedure for the correction of mandibular retrognathism. Commonly, the proximal and distal segments are fixated together with either wire or rigid screws or plates. The purpose of this study was to compare long-term (5 years) skeletal and dental changes between wire and rigid fixation after BSSO. In this multisite, prospective, randomized clinical trial, the rigid fixation group received three 2-mm bicortical position screws, and the wire fixation group received inferior border wires and 6 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with 24-gauge wires. Cephalometric films were obtained 2 weeks before surgery and at 1 week, 8 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years after surgery. Linear cephalometric changes were referenced to a cranial base coordinate system. Before surgery, both groups were comparable with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. Both groups underwent similar surgical changes. Skeletal and dental movements occurred in both groups throughout the study period. Five years after surgery, the wire group had 2.2 mm (42%) of sagittal skeletal relapse, while the rigid group remained unchanged from immediately postsurgery. Surprisingly, at 5 years, both groups had similar changes in overbite and overjet. This was attributed to dental changes in the maxillary and mandibular incisors. Although rigid fixation is more stable than wire fixation for maintaining the skeletal advancement after a BSSO, the incisor changes made the resultant occlusions of the 2 groups indistinguishable.

AB - The bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is the most common surgical procedure for the correction of mandibular retrognathism. Commonly, the proximal and distal segments are fixated together with either wire or rigid screws or plates. The purpose of this study was to compare long-term (5 years) skeletal and dental changes between wire and rigid fixation after BSSO. In this multisite, prospective, randomized clinical trial, the rigid fixation group received three 2-mm bicortical position screws, and the wire fixation group received inferior border wires and 6 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with 24-gauge wires. Cephalometric films were obtained 2 weeks before surgery and at 1 week, 8 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years after surgery. Linear cephalometric changes were referenced to a cranial base coordinate system. Before surgery, both groups were comparable with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. Both groups underwent similar surgical changes. Skeletal and dental movements occurred in both groups throughout the study period. Five years after surgery, the wire group had 2.2 mm (42%) of sagittal skeletal relapse, while the rigid group remained unchanged from immediately postsurgery. Surprisingly, at 5 years, both groups had similar changes in overbite and overjet. This was attributed to dental changes in the maxillary and mandibular incisors. Although rigid fixation is more stable than wire fixation for maintaining the skeletal advancement after a BSSO, the incisor changes made the resultant occlusions of the 2 groups indistinguishable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036593619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036593619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/mod.2002.123341

DO - 10.1067/mod.2002.123341

M3 - Article

C2 - 12080314

AN - SCOPUS:0036593619

VL - 121

SP - 610

EP - 619

JO - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

JF - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SN - 0889-5406

IS - 6

ER -