Revision of total elbow replacement by exchange cementing

A. A. Malone, J. S. Sanchez, R. Adams, B. Morrey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations


We report the effectiveness of revision of total elbow replacement by re-cementing. Between 1982 and 2004, 53 elbows in 52 patients were treated with re-cementing of a total elbow replacement into part or all of the existing cement mantle or into the debrided hostbone interface, without the use of structural bone augmentation or a custom prosthesis. The original implant revision was still in situ and functional in 42 of 53 elbows (79%) at a mean of 94.5 months (26 to 266) after surgery. In 31 of these 42 elbows (74%) the Mayo Elbow Performance Score was good or excellent. Overall, of the 53 elbows, 18 (34%) required re-operation, ten (19%) for loosening. A classification system was developed to identify those not suitable for revision by this technique, and using this we have showed that successful re-implantation is statistically correlated to properly addressing the bone deficiency for both the humeral (p = 0.005) and the ulnar (p = 0.039) components.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)80-85
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B
Volume94 B
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2012
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Revision of total elbow replacement by exchange cementing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this