Return on Investment and Value Research in Neuropsychology: A Call to Arms

Tannahill Glen, Gayle Hostetter, Tresa M. Roebuck-Spencer, William S. Garmoe, James G. Scott, Robin C. Hilsabeck, Peter Arnett, Patricia Espe-Pfeifer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations


There is substantial empirical evidence to support the clinical value of neuropsychological evaluation and the incremental value of neuropsychological assessment, suggesting such evaluation is beneficial in the prediction and management of clinical outcomes. However, in the cost-conscious and evolving era of healthcare reform, neuropsychologists must also establish the economic value, or return on investment, of their services. There is already a modest body of literature that demonstrates the economic benefits of neuropsychological evaluation, which is reviewed in the current paper. Neuropsychologists will need to be able to communicate, and develop evidence of, economic value of their services; thus, this paper also discusses common concepts, terms, and models used in healthcare valuation studies. Finally, neuropsychologists are urged to incorporate these financial concepts in their clinical practice and research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)459-468
Number of pages10
JournalArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jun 18 2020
Externally publishedYes


  • Health Care Reform
  • Neuropsychological Assessment
  • Return on Investment
  • Value

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health


Dive into the research topics of 'Return on Investment and Value Research in Neuropsychology: A Call to Arms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this