TY - JOUR
T1 - Resection of isolated distant nodal metastasis in metastatic colorectal cancer
AU - Isom, Chelsea
AU - Idrees, Kamran
AU - Wang, Li
AU - Tan, Marcus
AU - Parikh, Alexander A.
AU - Bailey, Christina E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - Background: Little is known regarding the role of resection in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) who present with isolated non-regional lymph node metastasis (NRLNM). Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, we identified patients diagnosed with CRC and NRLNM from 2004 to 2013. Results: A total of 849 patients presented with CRC and isolated NRLNM. Of these, 90 (10.6%) underwent resection of NRLNM. Median overall survival (OS) did not differ for patients who underwent resection of NRLNM compared to those who did not (33 versus 29 months, p = 0.68). Subgroup analysis by primary tumor site, also did not demonstrate a difference in median OS. Cox proportional hazard model revealed older age (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.34, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.17–1.53, p < 0.0001), higher tumor grade (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.52–2.16, p < 0.0001), and earlier year of diagnosis (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.17–1.53, p < 0.0001) were associated with decreased OS. There was no survival difference between those who underwent resection of NRLNM compared to those who had not (HR 0.997, p = 0.28). Conclusion: Resection of NRLNM in patients with CRC is not associated with an OS benefit. Further studies are needed to determine if there is a subset of patients who could potentially benefit from this resection strategy.
AB - Background: Little is known regarding the role of resection in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) who present with isolated non-regional lymph node metastasis (NRLNM). Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, we identified patients diagnosed with CRC and NRLNM from 2004 to 2013. Results: A total of 849 patients presented with CRC and isolated NRLNM. Of these, 90 (10.6%) underwent resection of NRLNM. Median overall survival (OS) did not differ for patients who underwent resection of NRLNM compared to those who did not (33 versus 29 months, p = 0.68). Subgroup analysis by primary tumor site, also did not demonstrate a difference in median OS. Cox proportional hazard model revealed older age (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.34, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.17–1.53, p < 0.0001), higher tumor grade (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.52–2.16, p < 0.0001), and earlier year of diagnosis (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.17–1.53, p < 0.0001) were associated with decreased OS. There was no survival difference between those who underwent resection of NRLNM compared to those who had not (HR 0.997, p = 0.28). Conclusion: Resection of NRLNM in patients with CRC is not associated with an OS benefit. Further studies are needed to determine if there is a subset of patients who could potentially benefit from this resection strategy.
KW - Colorectal cancer
KW - Nodal metastasis
KW - Nodal resection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078006245&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078006245&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.01.003
DO - 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.01.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 32561100
AN - SCOPUS:85078006245
SN - 0960-7404
VL - 33
SP - 58
EP - 62
JO - Surgical Oncology
JF - Surgical Oncology
ER -