Abstract
Bilder, Sugar, and Helleman (2014 this issue) have criticized recent publications on performance validity test (PVT) failure in clinical samples. Bilder and colleagues appear to make an idiosyncratic interpretation of recent research and inconsistently apply principles of null hypothesis significance testing. Overall, their position seems to propose that PVTs should be held to a higher psychometric standard than conventional neuropsychological tests. Problematic aspects of these criticisms are discussed. Additional consideration is given to research aims and findings.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1224-1229 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Clinical Neuropsychologist |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 17 2014 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- False positive rate
- Forensic neuropsychology
- Performance validity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Clinical Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)