Reliability, validity, and minimally important differences of the SF-6D in systemic sclerosis

Dinesh Khanna, Daniel E. Furst, Weng Kee Wong, Joel Tsevat, Philip J. Clements, Grace S. Park, Arnold E. Postlethwaite, Mansoor Ahmed, Shaari Ginsburg, Ron D. Hays

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and validity and estimate the minimally important difference (MID) for the SF-6D in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Subjects: We used data from two clinical studies to analyze the SF-6D in patients with SSc: Study 1 was a cross-sectional observational study (N = 107) designed to assess three direct preference measures-the rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble (SG) in patients with diffuse SSc and limited SSc, and Study 2 was a 12-month randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial (N = 168) assessing oral bovine collagen versus placebo in diffuse SSc. Methods: We assessed the test-retest reliability of the SF-6D in Study 2 over a mean (SD) 4.8 (3.0)-week interval and the agreement between the SF-6D and direct preference measures in Study 1 using intraclass correlations (ICC). The MID was estimated using three different anchors-the SF-36 change in health item (patients who answered "somewhat better" formed the MID group), the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI; change of ≥0.14 and ≥0.22) and the skin score (change of ≥5.3). Results: The mean (SD) SF-6D scores were 0.61 (0.12) in Study 1 and 0.64 (0.13) in Study 2. Test-retest reliability for the SF-6D was high (ICC = 0.82 [95% CI: 0.76, 0.87]). Agreement between the SF-6D and three direct preferences measures was poor to moderate (0.16-0.52). The MID estimate for the SF-6D using the change in SF-36 item -0.012 and this level of change was similar to the no change group. The mean MID estimate for the SF-6D improvement using the HAQ-DI and skin score as anchors was 0.035 (effect size of 0.27). Conclusion: This is the first study to assess the SF-6D in SSc. The SF-6D is reliable and valid in patients with SSc. We provide MID estimates that can aid in calculating sample size for clinical trials involving patients with diffuse SSc.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1083-1092
Number of pages10
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Minimally important difference
  • Preference-based measures
  • SF-6D
  • Scleroderma
  • Systemic sclerosis
  • Utility measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability, validity, and minimally important differences of the SF-6D in systemic sclerosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this