TY - JOUR
T1 - Relative bioavailability of immediate‐ and sustained‐release hydralazine formulations
AU - Ludden, Thomas M.
AU - Rotenberg, K. S.
AU - Ludden, L. K.
AU - Shepherd, Alexander M.M.
AU - Woodworth, J. R.
PY - 1988/12
Y1 - 1988/12
N2 - The in vivo performance of hydralazine sustained‐release dosage forms prepared using an ethylcellulose‐coated drug:resin complex was studied in healthy males who were determined to be slow acetylators. Two studies were performed. The first study (I) compared four different coating levels (6.8, 8.7, 10, and 12%) with an immediate‐release tablet and a solution. The second study (II) compared three additional coating levels (4, 5, and 7.8%) to the 6.8% formulation from the first study. Both hydralazine peak blood concentration (Cmax) and area under the blood concentration‐time curves (AUC) decreased as the coating level increased [coating level (Cmax, ng/mL; AUC, ng h/mL): 4% (37; 58), 5% (31; 55), 6.8% (13; 42 and 14; 39); 7.8% (16; 38), 8.7% (11; 34), 10% (7.8; 21), 12% (8.9; 17)]. In Study I both the solution and the immediate‐release tablet were administered in two divided doses at 8 a.m. (fasting) and 2 p.m. (post‐prandial). There was evidence for decreased bioavailability of unchanged hydralazine after the 2 p.m. doses as compared with the 8 a.m. doses. On the other hand, an assay that measures primarily the pyruvic acid conjugate of hydralazine yielded much higher concentrations after the afternoon dose. The results of these studies indicate that a sustained‐release dosage form of hydralazine can be prepared using an ethyl‐cellulose coated drug:resin complex and its in vivo characteristics are related to the coating level. Hydralazine bioavailability is influenced by food or recent prior exposure to hydralazine.
AB - The in vivo performance of hydralazine sustained‐release dosage forms prepared using an ethylcellulose‐coated drug:resin complex was studied in healthy males who were determined to be slow acetylators. Two studies were performed. The first study (I) compared four different coating levels (6.8, 8.7, 10, and 12%) with an immediate‐release tablet and a solution. The second study (II) compared three additional coating levels (4, 5, and 7.8%) to the 6.8% formulation from the first study. Both hydralazine peak blood concentration (Cmax) and area under the blood concentration‐time curves (AUC) decreased as the coating level increased [coating level (Cmax, ng/mL; AUC, ng h/mL): 4% (37; 58), 5% (31; 55), 6.8% (13; 42 and 14; 39); 7.8% (16; 38), 8.7% (11; 34), 10% (7.8; 21), 12% (8.9; 17)]. In Study I both the solution and the immediate‐release tablet were administered in two divided doses at 8 a.m. (fasting) and 2 p.m. (post‐prandial). There was evidence for decreased bioavailability of unchanged hydralazine after the 2 p.m. doses as compared with the 8 a.m. doses. On the other hand, an assay that measures primarily the pyruvic acid conjugate of hydralazine yielded much higher concentrations after the afternoon dose. The results of these studies indicate that a sustained‐release dosage form of hydralazine can be prepared using an ethyl‐cellulose coated drug:resin complex and its in vivo characteristics are related to the coating level. Hydralazine bioavailability is influenced by food or recent prior exposure to hydralazine.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024243006&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024243006&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jps.2600771208
DO - 10.1002/jps.2600771208
M3 - Article
C2 - 3244106
AN - SCOPUS:0024243006
SN - 0022-3549
VL - 77
SP - 1026
EP - 1032
JO - Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
JF - Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
IS - 12
ER -