Relationships between drug company representatives and medical students: Medical school policies and attitudes of student affairs deans and third-year medical students

Frederick S. Sierles, Amy Brodkey, Lynn Cleary, Frederick A. McCurdy, Matthew Mintz, Julia Frank, Deborah Joanne Lynn, Jason Chao, Bruce Morgenstern, William Shore, John Woodard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The authors sought to ascertain the details of medical school policies about relationships between drug companies and medical students as well as student affairs deans' attitudes about these interactions. Methods: In 2005, the authors surveyed deans and student affairs deans at all U.S. medical schools and asked whether their schools had a policy about relationships between drug companies and medical students. They asked deans at schools with policies to summarize them, queried student affairs deans regarding their attitudes about gifts, and compared their attitudes with those of students who were studied previously. Results: Independently of each other, 114 out of 126 deans (90.5%) and 114 out of 126 student affairs deans (90.5%) responded (identical numbers are not misprints). Ten schools had a policy regarding relationships between medical students and drug company representatives. Student affairs deans were much more likely than students to perceive that gifts were inappropriate. Conclusion: These 2005 policies show trends meriting review by current medical schools in considering how to comply with the 2008 Association of American Medical Colleges recommendations about relationships between drug companies and medical students or physicians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)478-483
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Psychiatry
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

school policy
Medical Schools
Medical Students
medical student
Students
drug
Pharmaceutical Preparations
student
Gift Giving
school
gift
American Medical Association
physician
Physicians
trend
interaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Education

Cite this

Relationships between drug company representatives and medical students : Medical school policies and attitudes of student affairs deans and third-year medical students. / Sierles, Frederick S.; Brodkey, Amy; Cleary, Lynn; McCurdy, Frederick A.; Mintz, Matthew; Frank, Julia; Lynn, Deborah Joanne; Chao, Jason; Morgenstern, Bruce; Shore, William; Woodard, John.

In: Academic Psychiatry, Vol. 33, No. 6, 11.2009, p. 478-483.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sierles, FS, Brodkey, A, Cleary, L, McCurdy, FA, Mintz, M, Frank, J, Lynn, DJ, Chao, J, Morgenstern, B, Shore, W & Woodard, J 2009, 'Relationships between drug company representatives and medical students: Medical school policies and attitudes of student affairs deans and third-year medical students', Academic Psychiatry, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 478-483. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.33.6.478
Sierles, Frederick S. ; Brodkey, Amy ; Cleary, Lynn ; McCurdy, Frederick A. ; Mintz, Matthew ; Frank, Julia ; Lynn, Deborah Joanne ; Chao, Jason ; Morgenstern, Bruce ; Shore, William ; Woodard, John. / Relationships between drug company representatives and medical students : Medical school policies and attitudes of student affairs deans and third-year medical students. In: Academic Psychiatry. 2009 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 478-483.
@article{450688271b8d4a2c994f7634cd0751ad,
title = "Relationships between drug company representatives and medical students: Medical school policies and attitudes of student affairs deans and third-year medical students",
abstract = "Objectives: The authors sought to ascertain the details of medical school policies about relationships between drug companies and medical students as well as student affairs deans' attitudes about these interactions. Methods: In 2005, the authors surveyed deans and student affairs deans at all U.S. medical schools and asked whether their schools had a policy about relationships between drug companies and medical students. They asked deans at schools with policies to summarize them, queried student affairs deans regarding their attitudes about gifts, and compared their attitudes with those of students who were studied previously. Results: Independently of each other, 114 out of 126 deans (90.5{\%}) and 114 out of 126 student affairs deans (90.5{\%}) responded (identical numbers are not misprints). Ten schools had a policy regarding relationships between medical students and drug company representatives. Student affairs deans were much more likely than students to perceive that gifts were inappropriate. Conclusion: These 2005 policies show trends meriting review by current medical schools in considering how to comply with the 2008 Association of American Medical Colleges recommendations about relationships between drug companies and medical students or physicians.",
author = "Sierles, {Frederick S.} and Amy Brodkey and Lynn Cleary and McCurdy, {Frederick A.} and Matthew Mintz and Julia Frank and Lynn, {Deborah Joanne} and Jason Chao and Bruce Morgenstern and William Shore and John Woodard",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1176/appi.ap.33.6.478",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "478--483",
journal = "Academic Psychiatry",
issn = "1042-9670",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationships between drug company representatives and medical students

T2 - Medical school policies and attitudes of student affairs deans and third-year medical students

AU - Sierles, Frederick S.

AU - Brodkey, Amy

AU - Cleary, Lynn

AU - McCurdy, Frederick A.

AU - Mintz, Matthew

AU - Frank, Julia

AU - Lynn, Deborah Joanne

AU - Chao, Jason

AU - Morgenstern, Bruce

AU - Shore, William

AU - Woodard, John

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - Objectives: The authors sought to ascertain the details of medical school policies about relationships between drug companies and medical students as well as student affairs deans' attitudes about these interactions. Methods: In 2005, the authors surveyed deans and student affairs deans at all U.S. medical schools and asked whether their schools had a policy about relationships between drug companies and medical students. They asked deans at schools with policies to summarize them, queried student affairs deans regarding their attitudes about gifts, and compared their attitudes with those of students who were studied previously. Results: Independently of each other, 114 out of 126 deans (90.5%) and 114 out of 126 student affairs deans (90.5%) responded (identical numbers are not misprints). Ten schools had a policy regarding relationships between medical students and drug company representatives. Student affairs deans were much more likely than students to perceive that gifts were inappropriate. Conclusion: These 2005 policies show trends meriting review by current medical schools in considering how to comply with the 2008 Association of American Medical Colleges recommendations about relationships between drug companies and medical students or physicians.

AB - Objectives: The authors sought to ascertain the details of medical school policies about relationships between drug companies and medical students as well as student affairs deans' attitudes about these interactions. Methods: In 2005, the authors surveyed deans and student affairs deans at all U.S. medical schools and asked whether their schools had a policy about relationships between drug companies and medical students. They asked deans at schools with policies to summarize them, queried student affairs deans regarding their attitudes about gifts, and compared their attitudes with those of students who were studied previously. Results: Independently of each other, 114 out of 126 deans (90.5%) and 114 out of 126 student affairs deans (90.5%) responded (identical numbers are not misprints). Ten schools had a policy regarding relationships between medical students and drug company representatives. Student affairs deans were much more likely than students to perceive that gifts were inappropriate. Conclusion: These 2005 policies show trends meriting review by current medical schools in considering how to comply with the 2008 Association of American Medical Colleges recommendations about relationships between drug companies and medical students or physicians.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72149085695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72149085695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1176/appi.ap.33.6.478

DO - 10.1176/appi.ap.33.6.478

M3 - Article

C2 - 19933893

AN - SCOPUS:72149085695

VL - 33

SP - 478

EP - 483

JO - Academic Psychiatry

JF - Academic Psychiatry

SN - 1042-9670

IS - 6

ER -