Rapid objective measurement of gamma camera resolution using statistical moments

Trish A. Hander, Jack L Lancaster, David T. Kopp, John C. Lasher, Ralph Blumhardt, Peter T Fox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An easy and rapid method for the measurement of the intrinsic spatial resolution of a gamma camera was developed. The measurement is based on the first and second statistical moments of regions of interest (ROIs) applied to bar phantom images. This leads to an estimate of the modulation transfer function (MTF) and the full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) of a line spread function (LSF). Bar phantom images were acquired using four large field-of- view (LFOV) gamma cameras (Scintronix, Picker, Searle, Siemens). The following factors important for routine measurement of gamma camera resolution with this method were tested: ROI placement and shape, phantom orientation, spatial sampling, and procedural consistency. A 0.2% coefficient of variation (CV) between repeat measurements of MTF was observed for a circular ROI. The CVs of less than 2% were observed for measured MTF values for bar orientations ranging from -10°to +10°with respect to the x and y axes of the camera acquisition matrix. A 256 x 256 matrix (1.6 mm pixel spacing) was judged sufficient for routine measurements, giving an estimate of the FWHM to within 0.1 mm of manufacturer-specified values (3% difference). Under simulated clinical conditions, the variation in measurements attributable to procedural effects yielded a CV of less than 2% in newer generation cameras. The moments method for determining MTF correlated well with a peak-valley method, with an average difference of 0.03 across the range of spatial frequencies tested (0.11-0.17 line pairs/mm, corresponding to 4.5-3.0 mm bars). When compared with the NEMA method for measuring intrinsic spatial resolution, the moments method was found to be within 4% of the expected FWHM.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-334
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Physics
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1997

Fingerprint

Gamma Cameras
Social Values

Keywords

  • FWHM
  • gamma camera
  • image evaluation
  • modulation transfer function
  • quality assurance
  • spatial resolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Hander, T. A., Lancaster, J. L., Kopp, D. T., Lasher, J. C., Blumhardt, R., & Fox, P. T. (1997). Rapid objective measurement of gamma camera resolution using statistical moments. Medical Physics, 24(2), 327-334. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597928

Rapid objective measurement of gamma camera resolution using statistical moments. / Hander, Trish A.; Lancaster, Jack L; Kopp, David T.; Lasher, John C.; Blumhardt, Ralph; Fox, Peter T.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 24, No. 2, 02.1997, p. 327-334.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hander, TA, Lancaster, JL, Kopp, DT, Lasher, JC, Blumhardt, R & Fox, PT 1997, 'Rapid objective measurement of gamma camera resolution using statistical moments', Medical Physics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 327-334. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597928
Hander, Trish A. ; Lancaster, Jack L ; Kopp, David T. ; Lasher, John C. ; Blumhardt, Ralph ; Fox, Peter T. / Rapid objective measurement of gamma camera resolution using statistical moments. In: Medical Physics. 1997 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 327-334.
@article{94ddf53ad60d4345af8fe5a63467e4e5,
title = "Rapid objective measurement of gamma camera resolution using statistical moments",
abstract = "An easy and rapid method for the measurement of the intrinsic spatial resolution of a gamma camera was developed. The measurement is based on the first and second statistical moments of regions of interest (ROIs) applied to bar phantom images. This leads to an estimate of the modulation transfer function (MTF) and the full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) of a line spread function (LSF). Bar phantom images were acquired using four large field-of- view (LFOV) gamma cameras (Scintronix, Picker, Searle, Siemens). The following factors important for routine measurement of gamma camera resolution with this method were tested: ROI placement and shape, phantom orientation, spatial sampling, and procedural consistency. A 0.2{\%} coefficient of variation (CV) between repeat measurements of MTF was observed for a circular ROI. The CVs of less than 2{\%} were observed for measured MTF values for bar orientations ranging from -10°to +10°with respect to the x and y axes of the camera acquisition matrix. A 256 x 256 matrix (1.6 mm pixel spacing) was judged sufficient for routine measurements, giving an estimate of the FWHM to within 0.1 mm of manufacturer-specified values (3{\%} difference). Under simulated clinical conditions, the variation in measurements attributable to procedural effects yielded a CV of less than 2{\%} in newer generation cameras. The moments method for determining MTF correlated well with a peak-valley method, with an average difference of 0.03 across the range of spatial frequencies tested (0.11-0.17 line pairs/mm, corresponding to 4.5-3.0 mm bars). When compared with the NEMA method for measuring intrinsic spatial resolution, the moments method was found to be within 4{\%} of the expected FWHM.",
keywords = "FWHM, gamma camera, image evaluation, modulation transfer function, quality assurance, spatial resolution",
author = "Hander, {Trish A.} and Lancaster, {Jack L} and Kopp, {David T.} and Lasher, {John C.} and Ralph Blumhardt and Fox, {Peter T}",
year = "1997",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1118/1.597928",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "327--334",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rapid objective measurement of gamma camera resolution using statistical moments

AU - Hander, Trish A.

AU - Lancaster, Jack L

AU - Kopp, David T.

AU - Lasher, John C.

AU - Blumhardt, Ralph

AU - Fox, Peter T

PY - 1997/2

Y1 - 1997/2

N2 - An easy and rapid method for the measurement of the intrinsic spatial resolution of a gamma camera was developed. The measurement is based on the first and second statistical moments of regions of interest (ROIs) applied to bar phantom images. This leads to an estimate of the modulation transfer function (MTF) and the full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) of a line spread function (LSF). Bar phantom images were acquired using four large field-of- view (LFOV) gamma cameras (Scintronix, Picker, Searle, Siemens). The following factors important for routine measurement of gamma camera resolution with this method were tested: ROI placement and shape, phantom orientation, spatial sampling, and procedural consistency. A 0.2% coefficient of variation (CV) between repeat measurements of MTF was observed for a circular ROI. The CVs of less than 2% were observed for measured MTF values for bar orientations ranging from -10°to +10°with respect to the x and y axes of the camera acquisition matrix. A 256 x 256 matrix (1.6 mm pixel spacing) was judged sufficient for routine measurements, giving an estimate of the FWHM to within 0.1 mm of manufacturer-specified values (3% difference). Under simulated clinical conditions, the variation in measurements attributable to procedural effects yielded a CV of less than 2% in newer generation cameras. The moments method for determining MTF correlated well with a peak-valley method, with an average difference of 0.03 across the range of spatial frequencies tested (0.11-0.17 line pairs/mm, corresponding to 4.5-3.0 mm bars). When compared with the NEMA method for measuring intrinsic spatial resolution, the moments method was found to be within 4% of the expected FWHM.

AB - An easy and rapid method for the measurement of the intrinsic spatial resolution of a gamma camera was developed. The measurement is based on the first and second statistical moments of regions of interest (ROIs) applied to bar phantom images. This leads to an estimate of the modulation transfer function (MTF) and the full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) of a line spread function (LSF). Bar phantom images were acquired using four large field-of- view (LFOV) gamma cameras (Scintronix, Picker, Searle, Siemens). The following factors important for routine measurement of gamma camera resolution with this method were tested: ROI placement and shape, phantom orientation, spatial sampling, and procedural consistency. A 0.2% coefficient of variation (CV) between repeat measurements of MTF was observed for a circular ROI. The CVs of less than 2% were observed for measured MTF values for bar orientations ranging from -10°to +10°with respect to the x and y axes of the camera acquisition matrix. A 256 x 256 matrix (1.6 mm pixel spacing) was judged sufficient for routine measurements, giving an estimate of the FWHM to within 0.1 mm of manufacturer-specified values (3% difference). Under simulated clinical conditions, the variation in measurements attributable to procedural effects yielded a CV of less than 2% in newer generation cameras. The moments method for determining MTF correlated well with a peak-valley method, with an average difference of 0.03 across the range of spatial frequencies tested (0.11-0.17 line pairs/mm, corresponding to 4.5-3.0 mm bars). When compared with the NEMA method for measuring intrinsic spatial resolution, the moments method was found to be within 4% of the expected FWHM.

KW - FWHM

KW - gamma camera

KW - image evaluation

KW - modulation transfer function

KW - quality assurance

KW - spatial resolution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031058213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031058213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.597928

DO - 10.1118/1.597928

M3 - Article

C2 - 9048375

AN - SCOPUS:0031058213

VL - 24

SP - 327

EP - 334

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 2

ER -