TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare AmnioExcel Human Amniotic Allograft in Weekly Versus Biweekly Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
AU - Lavery, Lawrence A.
AU - Suludere, Mehmet A.
AU - Raspovic, Kathryn
AU - Crisologo, Peter Andrew
AU - Johnson, Matthew J.
AU - Tarricone, Arthur N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Our objective was to compare clinical outcomes in diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) treated with AmnioExcel® applied weekly (AMX1) or biweekly (AMX2) over a 12-week evaluation period. This randomized clinical trial evaluated 40 people with UT 1A and 1D DFUs >30 days but less than 6 months duration and age >21 years. We excluded patients with untreated osteomyelitis, gangrene, widespread malignancy, or active substance abuse. Patients received amniotic tissue either once a week or every other week. We used a 3D measurement device (inSight, eKare, Fairfax, Virginia)”. There was no difference in the incidence of healing (AMX1 30.0% vs AMX2 50.0%, p = 0.20), time to heal (69.3 ± 30.3 vs 45.8 ± 25.6 days, p = 0.15), or incidence of infection (AMX1 35.0% vs AMX2 25.0%, p = 0.49). The mean wound area reduction was 0.18 ± 0.48 cm2 per week for AMX1 and 0.15 ± 0.63 cm2 week for AMX2 (p = 0.42). When we compared wound healing trajectories in healers and non-healers. There were no differences in the mean wound area reduction for healers (0.26 ± 0.40 cm2 per week) and non-healers (0.14 ± 0.52 cm2 per week, p = 0.20). Our results suggested there is no difference in the incidence of healing, time to heal or incidence of infection based on weekly or biweekly application of amniotic tissue.
AB - Our objective was to compare clinical outcomes in diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) treated with AmnioExcel® applied weekly (AMX1) or biweekly (AMX2) over a 12-week evaluation period. This randomized clinical trial evaluated 40 people with UT 1A and 1D DFUs >30 days but less than 6 months duration and age >21 years. We excluded patients with untreated osteomyelitis, gangrene, widespread malignancy, or active substance abuse. Patients received amniotic tissue either once a week or every other week. We used a 3D measurement device (inSight, eKare, Fairfax, Virginia)”. There was no difference in the incidence of healing (AMX1 30.0% vs AMX2 50.0%, p = 0.20), time to heal (69.3 ± 30.3 vs 45.8 ± 25.6 days, p = 0.15), or incidence of infection (AMX1 35.0% vs AMX2 25.0%, p = 0.49). The mean wound area reduction was 0.18 ± 0.48 cm2 per week for AMX1 and 0.15 ± 0.63 cm2 week for AMX2 (p = 0.42). When we compared wound healing trajectories in healers and non-healers. There were no differences in the mean wound area reduction for healers (0.26 ± 0.40 cm2 per week) and non-healers (0.14 ± 0.52 cm2 per week, p = 0.20). Our results suggested there is no difference in the incidence of healing, time to heal or incidence of infection based on weekly or biweekly application of amniotic tissue.
KW - amniotic membrane
KW - foot
KW - infection
KW - osteomyelitis
KW - peripheral arterial disease
KW - ulcer
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85214505469
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85214505469#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1177/15347346241276697
DO - 10.1177/15347346241276697
M3 - Article
C2 - 39784000
AN - SCOPUS:85214505469
SN - 1534-7346
JO - International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
JF - International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
ER -