Radical prostatectomy: Is the perineal approach more difficult to learn?

Joseph Mokulis, Ian Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We assessed the relative difficulty with which radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy operations are learned. Materials and Methods: The first 10 radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomies performed by 6 graduating urology residents were reviewed for patient and tumor characteristics, duration of surgery and hospitalization, and complication rates. Results: A total of 120 patients was reviewed. Mean hospital stay was 2.5 days less after radical perineal prostatectomy, and estimated blood loss, number of transfusions and complication rates were also less for this procedure. All parameters used to estimate the outcome of the procedure indicated that radical perineal prostatectomy was learned more quickly than radical retropubic prostatectomy. Conclusions: In a residency training program radical perineal prostatectomy was learned at least as easily as retropubic prostatectomy. Due to expanding indications for this procedure, these findings should encourage urological surgeons to develop their skill with this approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)230-232
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume157
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1997

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Urology
Internship and Residency
Length of Stay
Hospitalization
Education
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • prostate
  • prostatectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Radical prostatectomy : Is the perineal approach more difficult to learn? / Mokulis, Joseph; Thompson, Ian.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 157, No. 1, 01.1997, p. 230-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mokulis, J & Thompson, I 1997, 'Radical prostatectomy: Is the perineal approach more difficult to learn?', Journal of Urology, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 230-232.
Mokulis, Joseph ; Thompson, Ian. / Radical prostatectomy : Is the perineal approach more difficult to learn?. In: Journal of Urology. 1997 ; Vol. 157, No. 1. pp. 230-232.
@article{7c4bc2ceaee24d9ea5e762692bbca6de,
title = "Radical prostatectomy: Is the perineal approach more difficult to learn?",
abstract = "Purpose: We assessed the relative difficulty with which radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy operations are learned. Materials and Methods: The first 10 radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomies performed by 6 graduating urology residents were reviewed for patient and tumor characteristics, duration of surgery and hospitalization, and complication rates. Results: A total of 120 patients was reviewed. Mean hospital stay was 2.5 days less after radical perineal prostatectomy, and estimated blood loss, number of transfusions and complication rates were also less for this procedure. All parameters used to estimate the outcome of the procedure indicated that radical perineal prostatectomy was learned more quickly than radical retropubic prostatectomy. Conclusions: In a residency training program radical perineal prostatectomy was learned at least as easily as retropubic prostatectomy. Due to expanding indications for this procedure, these findings should encourage urological surgeons to develop their skill with this approach.",
keywords = "prostate, prostatectomy",
author = "Joseph Mokulis and Ian Thompson",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "157",
pages = "230--232",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radical prostatectomy

T2 - Is the perineal approach more difficult to learn?

AU - Mokulis, Joseph

AU - Thompson, Ian

PY - 1997/1

Y1 - 1997/1

N2 - Purpose: We assessed the relative difficulty with which radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy operations are learned. Materials and Methods: The first 10 radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomies performed by 6 graduating urology residents were reviewed for patient and tumor characteristics, duration of surgery and hospitalization, and complication rates. Results: A total of 120 patients was reviewed. Mean hospital stay was 2.5 days less after radical perineal prostatectomy, and estimated blood loss, number of transfusions and complication rates were also less for this procedure. All parameters used to estimate the outcome of the procedure indicated that radical perineal prostatectomy was learned more quickly than radical retropubic prostatectomy. Conclusions: In a residency training program radical perineal prostatectomy was learned at least as easily as retropubic prostatectomy. Due to expanding indications for this procedure, these findings should encourage urological surgeons to develop their skill with this approach.

AB - Purpose: We assessed the relative difficulty with which radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy operations are learned. Materials and Methods: The first 10 radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomies performed by 6 graduating urology residents were reviewed for patient and tumor characteristics, duration of surgery and hospitalization, and complication rates. Results: A total of 120 patients was reviewed. Mean hospital stay was 2.5 days less after radical perineal prostatectomy, and estimated blood loss, number of transfusions and complication rates were also less for this procedure. All parameters used to estimate the outcome of the procedure indicated that radical perineal prostatectomy was learned more quickly than radical retropubic prostatectomy. Conclusions: In a residency training program radical perineal prostatectomy was learned at least as easily as retropubic prostatectomy. Due to expanding indications for this procedure, these findings should encourage urological surgeons to develop their skill with this approach.

KW - prostate

KW - prostatectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031060401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031060401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8976259

AN - SCOPUS:0031060401

VL - 157

SP - 230

EP - 232

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 1

ER -