Quantitatively reviewing the literature: the application of meta-analysis.

David A Katerndahl, P. A. Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Meta-analysis has evolved as an alternative to the conventional narrative review. Its purpose is to statistically analyze a large collection of results from multiple studies in order to integrate the findings. There are three basic components of meta-analytic methodology. Inclusiveness involves the location of studies and decisions regarding which studies to include in the analysis. Quantification refers to the expression of such outcomes as effect sizes and the coding of study characteristics. Integrating outcomes involves the pooling of results from individual studies. Critics of meta-analysis have focused on aspects of the methodology, but careful meta-analytic procedure protects against most potential biases. The methodological and statistical rigor of meta-analysis pressures us to conceptualize our research more clearly and report results more completely.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-129
Number of pages7
JournalThe Family practice research journal
Volume6
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Pressure
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Quantitatively reviewing the literature : the application of meta-analysis. / Katerndahl, David A; Cohen, P. A.

In: The Family practice research journal, Vol. 6, No. 3, 03.1987, p. 123-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{649a3bdb16154503843710d373661baa,
title = "Quantitatively reviewing the literature: the application of meta-analysis.",
abstract = "Meta-analysis has evolved as an alternative to the conventional narrative review. Its purpose is to statistically analyze a large collection of results from multiple studies in order to integrate the findings. There are three basic components of meta-analytic methodology. Inclusiveness involves the location of studies and decisions regarding which studies to include in the analysis. Quantification refers to the expression of such outcomes as effect sizes and the coding of study characteristics. Integrating outcomes involves the pooling of results from individual studies. Critics of meta-analysis have focused on aspects of the methodology, but careful meta-analytic procedure protects against most potential biases. The methodological and statistical rigor of meta-analysis pressures us to conceptualize our research more clearly and report results more completely.",
author = "Katerndahl, {David A} and Cohen, {P. A.}",
year = "1987",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "123--129",
journal = "The Family practice research journal",
issn = "0270-2304",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitatively reviewing the literature

T2 - the application of meta-analysis.

AU - Katerndahl, David A

AU - Cohen, P. A.

PY - 1987/3

Y1 - 1987/3

N2 - Meta-analysis has evolved as an alternative to the conventional narrative review. Its purpose is to statistically analyze a large collection of results from multiple studies in order to integrate the findings. There are three basic components of meta-analytic methodology. Inclusiveness involves the location of studies and decisions regarding which studies to include in the analysis. Quantification refers to the expression of such outcomes as effect sizes and the coding of study characteristics. Integrating outcomes involves the pooling of results from individual studies. Critics of meta-analysis have focused on aspects of the methodology, but careful meta-analytic procedure protects against most potential biases. The methodological and statistical rigor of meta-analysis pressures us to conceptualize our research more clearly and report results more completely.

AB - Meta-analysis has evolved as an alternative to the conventional narrative review. Its purpose is to statistically analyze a large collection of results from multiple studies in order to integrate the findings. There are three basic components of meta-analytic methodology. Inclusiveness involves the location of studies and decisions regarding which studies to include in the analysis. Quantification refers to the expression of such outcomes as effect sizes and the coding of study characteristics. Integrating outcomes involves the pooling of results from individual studies. Critics of meta-analysis have focused on aspects of the methodology, but careful meta-analytic procedure protects against most potential biases. The methodological and statistical rigor of meta-analysis pressures us to conceptualize our research more clearly and report results more completely.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023303160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023303160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3331875

AN - SCOPUS:0023303160

VL - 6

SP - 123

EP - 129

JO - The Family practice research journal

JF - The Family practice research journal

SN - 0270-2304

IS - 3

ER -