TY - JOUR
T1 - Prospective external validation of a bladder cancer detection model
AU - Lotan, Yair
AU - Svatek, Robert S.
AU - Krabbe, Laura Maria
AU - Xylinas, Evanguelos
AU - Klatte, Tobias
AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
PY - 2014/11/1
Y1 - 2014/11/1
N2 - Purpose: Few studies have combined clinical prognostic factors with urinary biomarkers into risk profiles that can be used to predict the likelihood of bladder cancer. We previously developed and internally validated a bladder cancer detection nomogram that combines clinical features with the NMP22®BladderChek®test. To consider extensive use of the model the nomogram was tested in a prospective cohort of patients who presented with hematuria.Materials and Methods: Patients referred for hematuria evaluation were prospectively enrolled at 3 centers. Each patient underwent complete urological evaluation, including history, examination, cystoscopy, cytology and NMP22. A logistic regression model to predict urothelial bladder carcinoma was also developed to compare the performance of clinical data with and without adding NMP22 and urinary cytology.Results: The study included 381 patients (50.7% women) with a median age of 58 years. Urothelial bladder carcinoma was detected in 23 patients (6%). It was associated with age greater than 65 (11.1% vs 4% of patients, p =0.012), male gender (10.1% vs 2%, p =0.003), white ethnicity (9.2% vs 3.1%, p =0.016), gross hematuria (9.9% vs 2.5%, p =0.005), positive NMP22 (37% vs 3.7%, p <0.001) and positive cytology (83.3% vs 3.9%, p <0.001). Predictive accuracy of the bladder cancer detection nomogram was 80.2%. The calibration plot indicated that the previously published nomogram was well calibrated in patients with a less than 15% predicted probability of urothelial bladder carcinoma.Conclusions: We prospectively validated a highly accurate tool that combines clinical factors and a urinary biomarker to detect bladder cancer. This tool can help prioritize urological referrals for patients with hematuria.
AB - Purpose: Few studies have combined clinical prognostic factors with urinary biomarkers into risk profiles that can be used to predict the likelihood of bladder cancer. We previously developed and internally validated a bladder cancer detection nomogram that combines clinical features with the NMP22®BladderChek®test. To consider extensive use of the model the nomogram was tested in a prospective cohort of patients who presented with hematuria.Materials and Methods: Patients referred for hematuria evaluation were prospectively enrolled at 3 centers. Each patient underwent complete urological evaluation, including history, examination, cystoscopy, cytology and NMP22. A logistic regression model to predict urothelial bladder carcinoma was also developed to compare the performance of clinical data with and without adding NMP22 and urinary cytology.Results: The study included 381 patients (50.7% women) with a median age of 58 years. Urothelial bladder carcinoma was detected in 23 patients (6%). It was associated with age greater than 65 (11.1% vs 4% of patients, p =0.012), male gender (10.1% vs 2%, p =0.003), white ethnicity (9.2% vs 3.1%, p =0.016), gross hematuria (9.9% vs 2.5%, p =0.005), positive NMP22 (37% vs 3.7%, p <0.001) and positive cytology (83.3% vs 3.9%, p <0.001). Predictive accuracy of the bladder cancer detection nomogram was 80.2%. The calibration plot indicated that the previously published nomogram was well calibrated in patients with a less than 15% predicted probability of urothelial bladder carcinoma.Conclusions: We prospectively validated a highly accurate tool that combines clinical factors and a urinary biomarker to detect bladder cancer. This tool can help prioritize urological referrals for patients with hematuria.
KW - hematuria
KW - nuclear matrix protein 22
KW - prognosis
KW - urinary bladder
KW - urinary bladder neoplasms
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84910086236&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84910086236&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.087
DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.087
M3 - Article
C2 - 24859442
AN - SCOPUS:84910086236
SN - 0022-5347
VL - 192
SP - 1343
EP - 1348
JO - Journal of Urology
JF - Journal of Urology
IS - 5
ER -