Prone position in the acute respiratory distress syndrome

Antonio R Anzueto, Luciano Gattinoni

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Since the description of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in 1967 (1), mechanical ventilation has been the mainstay therapy of support to these patients. Furthermore, mechanical ventilation has been shown to result in lung injury; thus therapeutic strategies focused on preventing this injury have been shown to significantly decrease mortality (2). It was almost 10 years after the clinical description of ARDS that Piehl and Brown (3) first described the benefit of positional changes to improve arterial oxygenation in five patients with acute respiratory failure. Douglas et al. (4) confirmed these data in a more extensive study and also described significant improvement in arterial oxygenation in most, but not all, patients who were placed in the prone position. Possible mechanisms to explain the improvement of gas exchange during the prone position included a redistribution of blood flow and/or ventilation, an increase in lung functional and residual capacities, and changes in intrapulmonary pressure gradients. These two studies were based on the theoretical work by Bryan (5), who advocated the prone position in mechanically ventilated patients in order to improve regional inflation of dorsal portions of the lung. Over the last 20 years, there have been extensive reports on the pathophysiology of prone ventilation as well as the clinical application in acute lung injury (ALI) and ARDS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
PublisherCRC Press
Pages484-506
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)9780203912034
ISBN (Print)9780824740764
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Prone Position
Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Artificial Respiration
Ventilation
Functional Residual Capacity
Lung
Acute Lung Injury
Economic Inflation
Lung Injury
Respiratory Insufficiency
Gases
Pressure
Mortality
Wounds and Injuries
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Anzueto, A. R., & Gattinoni, L. (2003). Prone position in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. In Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (pp. 484-506). CRC Press.

Prone position in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. / Anzueto, Antonio R; Gattinoni, Luciano.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. CRC Press, 2003. p. 484-506.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Anzueto, AR & Gattinoni, L 2003, Prone position in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. CRC Press, pp. 484-506.
Anzueto AR, Gattinoni L. Prone position in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. In Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. CRC Press. 2003. p. 484-506
Anzueto, Antonio R ; Gattinoni, Luciano. / Prone position in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. CRC Press, 2003. pp. 484-506
@inbook{5dbee2f52a8540259ff172f395943d01,
title = "Prone position in the acute respiratory distress syndrome",
abstract = "Since the description of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in 1967 (1), mechanical ventilation has been the mainstay therapy of support to these patients. Furthermore, mechanical ventilation has been shown to result in lung injury; thus therapeutic strategies focused on preventing this injury have been shown to significantly decrease mortality (2). It was almost 10 years after the clinical description of ARDS that Piehl and Brown (3) first described the benefit of positional changes to improve arterial oxygenation in five patients with acute respiratory failure. Douglas et al. (4) confirmed these data in a more extensive study and also described significant improvement in arterial oxygenation in most, but not all, patients who were placed in the prone position. Possible mechanisms to explain the improvement of gas exchange during the prone position included a redistribution of blood flow and/or ventilation, an increase in lung functional and residual capacities, and changes in intrapulmonary pressure gradients. These two studies were based on the theoretical work by Bryan (5), who advocated the prone position in mechanically ventilated patients in order to improve regional inflation of dorsal portions of the lung. Over the last 20 years, there have been extensive reports on the pathophysiology of prone ventilation as well as the clinical application in acute lung injury (ALI) and ARDS.",
author = "Anzueto, {Antonio R} and Luciano Gattinoni",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780824740764",
pages = "484--506",
booktitle = "Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome",
publisher = "CRC Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Prone position in the acute respiratory distress syndrome

AU - Anzueto, Antonio R

AU - Gattinoni, Luciano

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Since the description of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in 1967 (1), mechanical ventilation has been the mainstay therapy of support to these patients. Furthermore, mechanical ventilation has been shown to result in lung injury; thus therapeutic strategies focused on preventing this injury have been shown to significantly decrease mortality (2). It was almost 10 years after the clinical description of ARDS that Piehl and Brown (3) first described the benefit of positional changes to improve arterial oxygenation in five patients with acute respiratory failure. Douglas et al. (4) confirmed these data in a more extensive study and also described significant improvement in arterial oxygenation in most, but not all, patients who were placed in the prone position. Possible mechanisms to explain the improvement of gas exchange during the prone position included a redistribution of blood flow and/or ventilation, an increase in lung functional and residual capacities, and changes in intrapulmonary pressure gradients. These two studies were based on the theoretical work by Bryan (5), who advocated the prone position in mechanically ventilated patients in order to improve regional inflation of dorsal portions of the lung. Over the last 20 years, there have been extensive reports on the pathophysiology of prone ventilation as well as the clinical application in acute lung injury (ALI) and ARDS.

AB - Since the description of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in 1967 (1), mechanical ventilation has been the mainstay therapy of support to these patients. Furthermore, mechanical ventilation has been shown to result in lung injury; thus therapeutic strategies focused on preventing this injury have been shown to significantly decrease mortality (2). It was almost 10 years after the clinical description of ARDS that Piehl and Brown (3) first described the benefit of positional changes to improve arterial oxygenation in five patients with acute respiratory failure. Douglas et al. (4) confirmed these data in a more extensive study and also described significant improvement in arterial oxygenation in most, but not all, patients who were placed in the prone position. Possible mechanisms to explain the improvement of gas exchange during the prone position included a redistribution of blood flow and/or ventilation, an increase in lung functional and residual capacities, and changes in intrapulmonary pressure gradients. These two studies were based on the theoretical work by Bryan (5), who advocated the prone position in mechanically ventilated patients in order to improve regional inflation of dorsal portions of the lung. Over the last 20 years, there have been extensive reports on the pathophysiology of prone ventilation as well as the clinical application in acute lung injury (ALI) and ARDS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059730520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059730520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85059730520

SN - 9780824740764

SP - 484

EP - 506

BT - Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

PB - CRC Press

ER -