Prognostic variability among chronic pain patients: Implications for study design, interpretation, and reporting

R. A. Deyo, J. E. Bass, Nicolas E Walsh, L. S. Schoenfeld, S. Ramamurthy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Chronic pain patients share many characteristics, but there is important prognostic variability among them. By selecting for certain characteristics, different recruitment methods and entry criteria for clinical or research programs may influence the likelihood of success regardless of treatment efficacy. This was demonstrated when subjects (n = 55) were recruited through lay publicity for a clinical trial of therapy for chronic back pain. In comparison to routine pain clinic patients (n = 61), subjects in the clinical trial were better educated, were more often employed, had more favorable personality profiles, and were less likely to have had surgery or narcotic use (all p<0.004). Pain relief was significantly better for clinical trial subjects, apparently due to baseline prognostic differences rather than uniquely efficacious therapy. We conclude that chronic pain patients vary in prognostically important ways; that recruitment methods and criteria strongly influence these characteristics; and that greater attention to these details is needed when interpreting and reporting clinical research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)174-178
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume69
Issue number3 I
StatePublished - 1988

Fingerprint

Chronic Pain
Clinical Trials
Pain Clinics
Narcotics
Back Pain
Research
Personality
Pain
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Prognostic variability among chronic pain patients : Implications for study design, interpretation, and reporting. / Deyo, R. A.; Bass, J. E.; Walsh, Nicolas E; Schoenfeld, L. S.; Ramamurthy, S.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 69, No. 3 I, 1988, p. 174-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{be8891b0d7a64fc3aaa00542e49a59ca,
title = "Prognostic variability among chronic pain patients: Implications for study design, interpretation, and reporting",
abstract = "Chronic pain patients share many characteristics, but there is important prognostic variability among them. By selecting for certain characteristics, different recruitment methods and entry criteria for clinical or research programs may influence the likelihood of success regardless of treatment efficacy. This was demonstrated when subjects (n = 55) were recruited through lay publicity for a clinical trial of therapy for chronic back pain. In comparison to routine pain clinic patients (n = 61), subjects in the clinical trial were better educated, were more often employed, had more favorable personality profiles, and were less likely to have had surgery or narcotic use (all p<0.004). Pain relief was significantly better for clinical trial subjects, apparently due to baseline prognostic differences rather than uniquely efficacious therapy. We conclude that chronic pain patients vary in prognostically important ways; that recruitment methods and criteria strongly influence these characteristics; and that greater attention to these details is needed when interpreting and reporting clinical research.",
author = "Deyo, {R. A.} and Bass, {J. E.} and Walsh, {Nicolas E} and Schoenfeld, {L. S.} and S. Ramamurthy",
year = "1988",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "174--178",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prognostic variability among chronic pain patients

T2 - Implications for study design, interpretation, and reporting

AU - Deyo, R. A.

AU - Bass, J. E.

AU - Walsh, Nicolas E

AU - Schoenfeld, L. S.

AU - Ramamurthy, S.

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - Chronic pain patients share many characteristics, but there is important prognostic variability among them. By selecting for certain characteristics, different recruitment methods and entry criteria for clinical or research programs may influence the likelihood of success regardless of treatment efficacy. This was demonstrated when subjects (n = 55) were recruited through lay publicity for a clinical trial of therapy for chronic back pain. In comparison to routine pain clinic patients (n = 61), subjects in the clinical trial were better educated, were more often employed, had more favorable personality profiles, and were less likely to have had surgery or narcotic use (all p<0.004). Pain relief was significantly better for clinical trial subjects, apparently due to baseline prognostic differences rather than uniquely efficacious therapy. We conclude that chronic pain patients vary in prognostically important ways; that recruitment methods and criteria strongly influence these characteristics; and that greater attention to these details is needed when interpreting and reporting clinical research.

AB - Chronic pain patients share many characteristics, but there is important prognostic variability among them. By selecting for certain characteristics, different recruitment methods and entry criteria for clinical or research programs may influence the likelihood of success regardless of treatment efficacy. This was demonstrated when subjects (n = 55) were recruited through lay publicity for a clinical trial of therapy for chronic back pain. In comparison to routine pain clinic patients (n = 61), subjects in the clinical trial were better educated, were more often employed, had more favorable personality profiles, and were less likely to have had surgery or narcotic use (all p<0.004). Pain relief was significantly better for clinical trial subjects, apparently due to baseline prognostic differences rather than uniquely efficacious therapy. We conclude that chronic pain patients vary in prognostically important ways; that recruitment methods and criteria strongly influence these characteristics; and that greater attention to these details is needed when interpreting and reporting clinical research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023906265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023906265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2964814

AN - SCOPUS:0023906265

VL - 69

SP - 174

EP - 178

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 3 I

ER -