Presentation Preoperative HIV testing: Is it less expensive than universal precautions?

Valerie A. Lawrence, Amiram Gafni, Kurt Kroenke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Universal precautions are officially recommended to prevent HIV transmission in health care settings but for elective surgery some advocate routine preoperative HIV testing. These strategies have not been tested in clinical trials but universal precautions are very expensive and not cost-effective. Thus, for elective surgery, routine testing might save resources by permitting selective use of additional barrier precautions. We performed an economic evaluation to compare both strategies, using a simple approach to determine if routine testing (RT) is less expensive than universal precautions (UP). Conservatively assuming equal effectiveness in preventing HIV transmission, we compared a minimized estimate for the average cost of RT with a maximized estimate for the average cost of UP per elective operation. The minimized estimate for RT (US$57) was greater than the maximized estimate for UP (US$36) per procedure. Results were stable or strengthened by sensitivity analysis. Routine HIV testing is not a valid economic alternative to UP for elective surgery. The simple methodology used in this study can be a preliminary strategy to review other strategies for preventing HIV transmission. This method is particularly useful when data are inadequate for a formal economic evaluation to determine the utility of collecting the detailed information necessary for a full comparison.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1219-1227
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume46
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Universal Precautions
HIV
Costs and Cost Analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Economics
Clinical Trials
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • control
  • HIV infection
  • Medical economics
  • Occupational diseases
  • Preoperative care
  • prevention
  • Risk factors
  • Surgical (operative)
  • transmission

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Presentation Preoperative HIV testing : Is it less expensive than universal precautions? / Lawrence, Valerie A.; Gafni, Amiram; Kroenke, Kurt.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 46, No. 11, 1993, p. 1219-1227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lawrence, Valerie A. ; Gafni, Amiram ; Kroenke, Kurt. / Presentation Preoperative HIV testing : Is it less expensive than universal precautions?. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1993 ; Vol. 46, No. 11. pp. 1219-1227.
@article{4cf4081f95344592b8ce901ee4146889,
title = "Presentation Preoperative HIV testing: Is it less expensive than universal precautions?",
abstract = "Universal precautions are officially recommended to prevent HIV transmission in health care settings but for elective surgery some advocate routine preoperative HIV testing. These strategies have not been tested in clinical trials but universal precautions are very expensive and not cost-effective. Thus, for elective surgery, routine testing might save resources by permitting selective use of additional barrier precautions. We performed an economic evaluation to compare both strategies, using a simple approach to determine if routine testing (RT) is less expensive than universal precautions (UP). Conservatively assuming equal effectiveness in preventing HIV transmission, we compared a minimized estimate for the average cost of RT with a maximized estimate for the average cost of UP per elective operation. The minimized estimate for RT (US$57) was greater than the maximized estimate for UP (US$36) per procedure. Results were stable or strengthened by sensitivity analysis. Routine HIV testing is not a valid economic alternative to UP for elective surgery. The simple methodology used in this study can be a preliminary strategy to review other strategies for preventing HIV transmission. This method is particularly useful when data are inadequate for a formal economic evaluation to determine the utility of collecting the detailed information necessary for a full comparison.",
keywords = "control, HIV infection, Medical economics, Occupational diseases, Preoperative care, prevention, Risk factors, Surgical (operative), transmission",
author = "Lawrence, {Valerie A.} and Amiram Gafni and Kurt Kroenke",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1016/0895-4356(93)90084-E",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "1219--1227",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Presentation Preoperative HIV testing

T2 - Is it less expensive than universal precautions?

AU - Lawrence, Valerie A.

AU - Gafni, Amiram

AU - Kroenke, Kurt

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Universal precautions are officially recommended to prevent HIV transmission in health care settings but for elective surgery some advocate routine preoperative HIV testing. These strategies have not been tested in clinical trials but universal precautions are very expensive and not cost-effective. Thus, for elective surgery, routine testing might save resources by permitting selective use of additional barrier precautions. We performed an economic evaluation to compare both strategies, using a simple approach to determine if routine testing (RT) is less expensive than universal precautions (UP). Conservatively assuming equal effectiveness in preventing HIV transmission, we compared a minimized estimate for the average cost of RT with a maximized estimate for the average cost of UP per elective operation. The minimized estimate for RT (US$57) was greater than the maximized estimate for UP (US$36) per procedure. Results were stable or strengthened by sensitivity analysis. Routine HIV testing is not a valid economic alternative to UP for elective surgery. The simple methodology used in this study can be a preliminary strategy to review other strategies for preventing HIV transmission. This method is particularly useful when data are inadequate for a formal economic evaluation to determine the utility of collecting the detailed information necessary for a full comparison.

AB - Universal precautions are officially recommended to prevent HIV transmission in health care settings but for elective surgery some advocate routine preoperative HIV testing. These strategies have not been tested in clinical trials but universal precautions are very expensive and not cost-effective. Thus, for elective surgery, routine testing might save resources by permitting selective use of additional barrier precautions. We performed an economic evaluation to compare both strategies, using a simple approach to determine if routine testing (RT) is less expensive than universal precautions (UP). Conservatively assuming equal effectiveness in preventing HIV transmission, we compared a minimized estimate for the average cost of RT with a maximized estimate for the average cost of UP per elective operation. The minimized estimate for RT (US$57) was greater than the maximized estimate for UP (US$36) per procedure. Results were stable or strengthened by sensitivity analysis. Routine HIV testing is not a valid economic alternative to UP for elective surgery. The simple methodology used in this study can be a preliminary strategy to review other strategies for preventing HIV transmission. This method is particularly useful when data are inadequate for a formal economic evaluation to determine the utility of collecting the detailed information necessary for a full comparison.

KW - control

KW - HIV infection

KW - Medical economics

KW - Occupational diseases

KW - Preoperative care

KW - prevention

KW - Risk factors

KW - Surgical (operative)

KW - transmission

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027429419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027429419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90084-E

DO - 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90084-E

M3 - Article

C2 - 8229097

AN - SCOPUS:0027429419

VL - 46

SP - 1219

EP - 1227

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 11

ER -