Prehospital use of ketamine: Effectiveness in critically ill and injured patients

John Zietlow, Kathy Berns, Donald Jenkins, Scott Zietlow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background The military use of ketamine is well established. The benefits of prehospital civilian use have not been extensively reported. Methods A retrospective review was performed of patients with prehospital ketamine use in Mayo One's air and critical care ground transport. Results The medical records were reviewed from 2014 to 2016 to assess the efficacy of Ketamine. During this time frame, 158 (167 instances) patients were treated with ketamine for analgesia (38%), sedation (44%), or procedural (18%) use. The patient population had a mean age of 49 (range: 1-100), with 105 (67%) male patients. Indications included trauma (69%), which was further broken down into blunt (57%), penetrating (4%), and miscellaneous (8%), and medical illness (31%). The mean ketamine dose was 52.6 mg (range: 5-200 mg) via intravenous route. Ketamine was utilized in 61% of patients after other medications were ineffective. Overall success rate was 98%. Mean pain scale before and after ketamine use was 9/10 and 3/10, respectively. Ketamine use increased yearly from 21 (13%) in 2014, 56 (36%) in 2015, and 81 (51%) in 2016. Conclusion Prehospital ketamine use is effective alone or in conjunction with other medications for analgesia, sedation, and procedural use in trauma and critically ill patients with minimal hemodynamic and respiratory consequences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)542-544
Number of pages3
JournalMilitary medicine
Volume184
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Keywords

  • critical care
  • ketamine
  • prehospital use
  • trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prehospital use of ketamine: Effectiveness in critically ill and injured patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this