Preference-based quality of life in patients with cerebral aneurysms

Joseph T. King, Joel Tsevat, Mark S. Roberts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose - Functional outcome scales are typically used to measure quality of life (QOL) and outcomes in patients with cerebral aneurysms; however, these instruments only examine a limited number of domains that contribute to QOL. An alternative are preference-based QOL methods, which integrate all factors contributing to QOL and provide a comprehensive individualized measure of how patients value their current health state. An additional advantage of preference-based QOL values is that they can be incorporated into decision analyses and cost-effectiveness analyses. Methods - We used 4 preference-based QOL methods to measure QOL in 176 outpatients with cerebral aneurysms: (1) standard gamble; (2) time trade-off; (3) visual analogue scale; and (4) willingness to pay. We measured functional status with the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), Rankin Scale, and Barthel Index. We then built multivariate linear regression models to examine the relationships between preference-based QOL, functional status, and patient characteristics. Results - Preference-based QOL was moderately diminished in the aneurysm patients. Mean values were; standard gamble, 0.78; time trade-off, 0.79; visual analogue scale, 0.67; and willingness to pay, $121 000. Preference-based QOL was not well-explained by functional status or patient characteristics, as shown by regression models that accounted for <15% of the variation in preference-based QOL (R2<0.15). Conclusions - Preference-based QOL instruments capture components of QOL in patients with cerebral aneurysms not assessed by functional status measures or patient characteristics. Studies of patients with cerebral aneurysms should consider incorporating preference-based QOL measures for a fuller evaluation of the impact of aneurysmal disease and its treatment on QOL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)303-309
Number of pages7
JournalStroke
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intracranial Aneurysm
Quality of Life
Visual Analog Scale
Linear Models
Glasgow Outcome Scale
Decision Support Techniques
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Aneurysm

Keywords

  • Intracranial aneurysm
  • Neurosurgery
  • Outcome
  • Quality of life
  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Preference-based quality of life in patients with cerebral aneurysms. / King, Joseph T.; Tsevat, Joel; Roberts, Mark S.

In: Stroke, Vol. 36, No. 2, 01.02.2005, p. 303-309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

King, Joseph T. ; Tsevat, Joel ; Roberts, Mark S. / Preference-based quality of life in patients with cerebral aneurysms. In: Stroke. 2005 ; Vol. 36, No. 2. pp. 303-309.
@article{3f91511ad99647d8b7c48928074100a9,
title = "Preference-based quality of life in patients with cerebral aneurysms",
abstract = "Background and Purpose - Functional outcome scales are typically used to measure quality of life (QOL) and outcomes in patients with cerebral aneurysms; however, these instruments only examine a limited number of domains that contribute to QOL. An alternative are preference-based QOL methods, which integrate all factors contributing to QOL and provide a comprehensive individualized measure of how patients value their current health state. An additional advantage of preference-based QOL values is that they can be incorporated into decision analyses and cost-effectiveness analyses. Methods - We used 4 preference-based QOL methods to measure QOL in 176 outpatients with cerebral aneurysms: (1) standard gamble; (2) time trade-off; (3) visual analogue scale; and (4) willingness to pay. We measured functional status with the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), Rankin Scale, and Barthel Index. We then built multivariate linear regression models to examine the relationships between preference-based QOL, functional status, and patient characteristics. Results - Preference-based QOL was moderately diminished in the aneurysm patients. Mean values were; standard gamble, 0.78; time trade-off, 0.79; visual analogue scale, 0.67; and willingness to pay, $121 000. Preference-based QOL was not well-explained by functional status or patient characteristics, as shown by regression models that accounted for <15{\%} of the variation in preference-based QOL (R2<0.15). Conclusions - Preference-based QOL instruments capture components of QOL in patients with cerebral aneurysms not assessed by functional status measures or patient characteristics. Studies of patients with cerebral aneurysms should consider incorporating preference-based QOL measures for a fuller evaluation of the impact of aneurysmal disease and its treatment on QOL.",
keywords = "Intracranial aneurysm, Neurosurgery, Outcome, Quality of life, Subarachnoid hemorrhage",
author = "King, {Joseph T.} and Joel Tsevat and Roberts, {Mark S.}",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1161/01.STR.0000152950.46598.f1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "303--309",
journal = "Stroke",
issn = "0039-2499",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preference-based quality of life in patients with cerebral aneurysms

AU - King, Joseph T.

AU - Tsevat, Joel

AU - Roberts, Mark S.

PY - 2005/2/1

Y1 - 2005/2/1

N2 - Background and Purpose - Functional outcome scales are typically used to measure quality of life (QOL) and outcomes in patients with cerebral aneurysms; however, these instruments only examine a limited number of domains that contribute to QOL. An alternative are preference-based QOL methods, which integrate all factors contributing to QOL and provide a comprehensive individualized measure of how patients value their current health state. An additional advantage of preference-based QOL values is that they can be incorporated into decision analyses and cost-effectiveness analyses. Methods - We used 4 preference-based QOL methods to measure QOL in 176 outpatients with cerebral aneurysms: (1) standard gamble; (2) time trade-off; (3) visual analogue scale; and (4) willingness to pay. We measured functional status with the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), Rankin Scale, and Barthel Index. We then built multivariate linear regression models to examine the relationships between preference-based QOL, functional status, and patient characteristics. Results - Preference-based QOL was moderately diminished in the aneurysm patients. Mean values were; standard gamble, 0.78; time trade-off, 0.79; visual analogue scale, 0.67; and willingness to pay, $121 000. Preference-based QOL was not well-explained by functional status or patient characteristics, as shown by regression models that accounted for <15% of the variation in preference-based QOL (R2<0.15). Conclusions - Preference-based QOL instruments capture components of QOL in patients with cerebral aneurysms not assessed by functional status measures or patient characteristics. Studies of patients with cerebral aneurysms should consider incorporating preference-based QOL measures for a fuller evaluation of the impact of aneurysmal disease and its treatment on QOL.

AB - Background and Purpose - Functional outcome scales are typically used to measure quality of life (QOL) and outcomes in patients with cerebral aneurysms; however, these instruments only examine a limited number of domains that contribute to QOL. An alternative are preference-based QOL methods, which integrate all factors contributing to QOL and provide a comprehensive individualized measure of how patients value their current health state. An additional advantage of preference-based QOL values is that they can be incorporated into decision analyses and cost-effectiveness analyses. Methods - We used 4 preference-based QOL methods to measure QOL in 176 outpatients with cerebral aneurysms: (1) standard gamble; (2) time trade-off; (3) visual analogue scale; and (4) willingness to pay. We measured functional status with the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), Rankin Scale, and Barthel Index. We then built multivariate linear regression models to examine the relationships between preference-based QOL, functional status, and patient characteristics. Results - Preference-based QOL was moderately diminished in the aneurysm patients. Mean values were; standard gamble, 0.78; time trade-off, 0.79; visual analogue scale, 0.67; and willingness to pay, $121 000. Preference-based QOL was not well-explained by functional status or patient characteristics, as shown by regression models that accounted for <15% of the variation in preference-based QOL (R2<0.15). Conclusions - Preference-based QOL instruments capture components of QOL in patients with cerebral aneurysms not assessed by functional status measures or patient characteristics. Studies of patients with cerebral aneurysms should consider incorporating preference-based QOL measures for a fuller evaluation of the impact of aneurysmal disease and its treatment on QOL.

KW - Intracranial aneurysm

KW - Neurosurgery

KW - Outcome

KW - Quality of life

KW - Subarachnoid hemorrhage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12844266741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12844266741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/01.STR.0000152950.46598.f1

DO - 10.1161/01.STR.0000152950.46598.f1

M3 - Article

C2 - 15653579

AN - SCOPUS:12844266741

VL - 36

SP - 303

EP - 309

JO - Stroke

JF - Stroke

SN - 0039-2499

IS - 2

ER -