Preeclampsia: Is induction of labor more successful?

Elly M.J. Xenakis, Jeanna M. Piper, Nancy Field, Deborah Conway, Oded Langer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations


Objective: To test the hypothesis that preeclamptic women are more readily inducible than are nonpreeclamptic women, regardless of cervical condition. Methods: One hundred eighty-three preeclamptic women and 461 nonpreeclamptic women requiring labor induction were studied prospectively. Patients were categorized by Bishop score, parity, gestational age, and method of induction. Outcome variables were success of induction and cesarean delivery rates. Results: Failed induction was significantly more common in the preeclamptic group (8.2% versus 1.7%; odds ratio [OR] 5.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.97, 13.28), as was cesarean delivery (28% versus 16%; OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.36, 3.18). When controlled by logistic regression for Bishop score, parity, method of induction, epidural anesthesia, macrosomia, and gestational age, a fourfold higher risk of failed induction and a twofold higher risk of cesarean delivery were found in the preeclamptic group. Conclusions: Induction of labor in preeclamptic women has a higher risk of failure and consequently of cesarean delivery than in nonpreeclamptic women. The vast majority of patients achieve vaginal delivery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)600-603
Number of pages4
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 1 1997

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology


Dive into the research topics of 'Preeclampsia: Is induction of labor more successful?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this