TY - JOUR
T1 - Practice Changes at U.S. Transplant Centers After the New Adult Heart Allocation Policy
AU - Parker, William F.
AU - Chung, Kevin
AU - Anderson, Allen S.
AU - Siegler, Mark
AU - Huang, Elbert S.
AU - Churpek, Matthew M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2020/6/16
Y1 - 2020/6/16
N2 - Background: In October 2018, the U.S. heart allocation system expanded the number of priority “status” tiers from 3 to 6 and added cardiogenic shock requirements for some heart transplant candidates listed with specific types of treatments. Objectives: This study sought to determine the impact of the new policy on the treatment practices of transplant centers. Methods: Initial listing data on all adult heart candidates listed from December 1, 2017 to April 30, 2019 were collected from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. The status-qualifying treatments (or exception requests) and hemodynamic values at listing of a post-policy cohort (December 2018 to April 2019) were compared with a seasonally matched pre-policy cohort (December 2017 to April 2018). Candidates in the pre-policy cohort were reclassified into the new priority system statuses by using treatment, diagnosis, and hemodynamics. Results: Comparing the post-policy cohort (N = 1,567) with the pre-policy cohort (N = 1,606), there were significant increases in listings with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (+1.2%), intra-aortic balloon pumps (+ 4 %), and exceptions (+ 12%). Listings with low-dose inotropes (−18%) and high-dose inotropes (−3%) significantly decreased. The new priority status distribution had more status 2 (+14%) candidates than expected and fewer status 3 (−5%), status 4 (− 4%) and status 6 (−8%) candidates than expected (p values <0.01 for all comparisons). Conclusions: After implementation of the new heart allocation policy, transplant centers listed more candidates with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, intra-aortic balloon pumps, and exception requests and fewer candidates with inotrope therapy than expected, thus leading to significantly more high-priority status listings than anticipated. If these early trends persist, the new allocation system may not function as intended.
AB - Background: In October 2018, the U.S. heart allocation system expanded the number of priority “status” tiers from 3 to 6 and added cardiogenic shock requirements for some heart transplant candidates listed with specific types of treatments. Objectives: This study sought to determine the impact of the new policy on the treatment practices of transplant centers. Methods: Initial listing data on all adult heart candidates listed from December 1, 2017 to April 30, 2019 were collected from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. The status-qualifying treatments (or exception requests) and hemodynamic values at listing of a post-policy cohort (December 2018 to April 2019) were compared with a seasonally matched pre-policy cohort (December 2017 to April 2018). Candidates in the pre-policy cohort were reclassified into the new priority system statuses by using treatment, diagnosis, and hemodynamics. Results: Comparing the post-policy cohort (N = 1,567) with the pre-policy cohort (N = 1,606), there were significant increases in listings with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (+1.2%), intra-aortic balloon pumps (+ 4 %), and exceptions (+ 12%). Listings with low-dose inotropes (−18%) and high-dose inotropes (−3%) significantly decreased. The new priority status distribution had more status 2 (+14%) candidates than expected and fewer status 3 (−5%), status 4 (− 4%) and status 6 (−8%) candidates than expected (p values <0.01 for all comparisons). Conclusions: After implementation of the new heart allocation policy, transplant centers listed more candidates with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, intra-aortic balloon pumps, and exception requests and fewer candidates with inotrope therapy than expected, thus leading to significantly more high-priority status listings than anticipated. If these early trends persist, the new allocation system may not function as intended.
KW - allocation
KW - ethics
KW - heart transplantation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085624654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85085624654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.066
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.066
M3 - Article
C2 - 32527399
AN - SCOPUS:85085624654
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 75
SP - 2906
EP - 2916
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 23
ER -