Pilon fractures: Consensus and controversy

Michael Flores, Matthew Ciminero, Stephen A. Kottmeier, Daniel Botros, Boris A. Zelle, David W. Shearer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Summary:Pilon fractures are complex injuries that require an individualized approach to treatment to avoid complications and achieve good outcomes. Staged open reduction internal fixation remains the gold standard for most cases to achieve anatomic articular reduction while minimizing soft tissue complications and infection. Careful preoperative planning based on computed tomography dictates the surgical approach for reduction. A subset of cases may be amenable to early definitive or provisional open reduction and internal fixation based on fracture pattern. In some cases of severe articular comminution where reconstruction is not possible, primary ankle arthrodesis may be a good alternative.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere236
JournalOTA International
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2023

Keywords

  • ankle fracture
  • pilon fracture
  • tibial plafond

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pilon fractures: Consensus and controversy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this