Pigeon performance on a variable-interval omission schedule at different levels of food deprivation

Paul Lewis, Donald M Dougherty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

After modifying a variable-interval schedule to include an omission contingency, we investigated rates of responding and performance at different levels of food deprivation in pigeons. The variable-interval schedule had intervals which averaged 30 s in duration. Any response made during a particular interval cancelled the food delivery at the end of the interval. Following intervals in which no response occured, the first response produced a 6-s access to grain. Sessions lasted until 150 of these intervals had been presented. Food deprivation was manipulated in two ways. In the first, pigeons started at 90% of their free-feeding weights and were gradually reduced to their 70% levels. In the second, pigeons were maintained at three specific levels of their free-feeding weights: 70, 80, and 90%. During all sessions, rates of responding and the percentage of reinforcers omitted were recorded. The results from both methods of deprivation were similar: (1) rates of responding systematically increased as pigeon's body weights decreased; and (2) performance, as indicated by the percentage of reinforcer omissions, worsened as pigeon's body weights declined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-35
Number of pages9
JournalBehavioural Processes
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Food Deprivation
food deprivation
Columbidae
pigeons
Appointments and Schedules
food
Body Weight
Weights and Measures
body weight
Food
duration
rate

Keywords

  • Food deprivation
  • Key peck
  • Omission training
  • Pigeon
  • Signal control
  • Variable-interval schedule

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Pigeon performance on a variable-interval omission schedule at different levels of food deprivation. / Lewis, Paul; Dougherty, Donald M.

In: Behavioural Processes, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1992, p. 27-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c4f7714a81b046d8a6ec8cda30e7a707,
title = "Pigeon performance on a variable-interval omission schedule at different levels of food deprivation",
abstract = "After modifying a variable-interval schedule to include an omission contingency, we investigated rates of responding and performance at different levels of food deprivation in pigeons. The variable-interval schedule had intervals which averaged 30 s in duration. Any response made during a particular interval cancelled the food delivery at the end of the interval. Following intervals in which no response occured, the first response produced a 6-s access to grain. Sessions lasted until 150 of these intervals had been presented. Food deprivation was manipulated in two ways. In the first, pigeons started at 90{\%} of their free-feeding weights and were gradually reduced to their 70{\%} levels. In the second, pigeons were maintained at three specific levels of their free-feeding weights: 70, 80, and 90{\%}. During all sessions, rates of responding and the percentage of reinforcers omitted were recorded. The results from both methods of deprivation were similar: (1) rates of responding systematically increased as pigeon's body weights decreased; and (2) performance, as indicated by the percentage of reinforcer omissions, worsened as pigeon's body weights declined.",
keywords = "Food deprivation, Key peck, Omission training, Pigeon, Signal control, Variable-interval schedule",
author = "Paul Lewis and Dougherty, {Donald M}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1016/0376-6357(92)90037-E",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "27--35",
journal = "Behavioural Processes",
issn = "0376-6357",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pigeon performance on a variable-interval omission schedule at different levels of food deprivation

AU - Lewis, Paul

AU - Dougherty, Donald M

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - After modifying a variable-interval schedule to include an omission contingency, we investigated rates of responding and performance at different levels of food deprivation in pigeons. The variable-interval schedule had intervals which averaged 30 s in duration. Any response made during a particular interval cancelled the food delivery at the end of the interval. Following intervals in which no response occured, the first response produced a 6-s access to grain. Sessions lasted until 150 of these intervals had been presented. Food deprivation was manipulated in two ways. In the first, pigeons started at 90% of their free-feeding weights and were gradually reduced to their 70% levels. In the second, pigeons were maintained at three specific levels of their free-feeding weights: 70, 80, and 90%. During all sessions, rates of responding and the percentage of reinforcers omitted were recorded. The results from both methods of deprivation were similar: (1) rates of responding systematically increased as pigeon's body weights decreased; and (2) performance, as indicated by the percentage of reinforcer omissions, worsened as pigeon's body weights declined.

AB - After modifying a variable-interval schedule to include an omission contingency, we investigated rates of responding and performance at different levels of food deprivation in pigeons. The variable-interval schedule had intervals which averaged 30 s in duration. Any response made during a particular interval cancelled the food delivery at the end of the interval. Following intervals in which no response occured, the first response produced a 6-s access to grain. Sessions lasted until 150 of these intervals had been presented. Food deprivation was manipulated in two ways. In the first, pigeons started at 90% of their free-feeding weights and were gradually reduced to their 70% levels. In the second, pigeons were maintained at three specific levels of their free-feeding weights: 70, 80, and 90%. During all sessions, rates of responding and the percentage of reinforcers omitted were recorded. The results from both methods of deprivation were similar: (1) rates of responding systematically increased as pigeon's body weights decreased; and (2) performance, as indicated by the percentage of reinforcer omissions, worsened as pigeon's body weights declined.

KW - Food deprivation

KW - Key peck

KW - Omission training

KW - Pigeon

KW - Signal control

KW - Variable-interval schedule

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026742027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026742027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0376-6357(92)90037-E

DO - 10.1016/0376-6357(92)90037-E

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026742027

VL - 27

SP - 27

EP - 35

JO - Behavioural Processes

JF - Behavioural Processes

SN - 0376-6357

IS - 1

ER -