Photocephalometry: Errors of projection and landmark location

Ceib Phillips, Jim Greer, Peter Vig, Steve Matteson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A method called photocephalometry was recently described for the possible soft-tissue evaluation of orthognathic surgery patients by the superimposition of coordinated cephalographs and photographs. A grid analysis was performed to determine the accuracy of the superimposition method. In addition, the reliability of landmark identification was analyzed by the method error of Baumrind and Frantz, using three replicates of twelve patients' photographs. Comparison of twenty-one grid intervals showed that the magnification of the photographic image for any given grid plane is not correlated to that of the radiographic image. Accurate comparisons between soft- and hard-tissue anatomy by simply superimposing the images are not feasible because of the difference in the enlargement factors between the photographs and x-ray films. As was noted by Baumrind and Frantz, a wide range exists in the variability of estimating the location of landmarks. Sixty-six percent of the lateral photographic landmarks and 57% of the frontal landmarks had absolute mean errors for all twelve patients that were less than or equal to 2.0 mm. In general, the envelope of error for most landmarks was not circular. Although the photocephalometric apparatus as described by Hohl and colleagues does not yield the desired quantitative correlation between hard and soft tissues, valuable quantitative information on soft tissue can be easily obtained with the standardization and replication possible with the camera setup and enlarged photographs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-243
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics
Volume86
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Orthognathic Surgery
Motion Pictures
Anatomy
X-Rays

Keywords

  • photocephalometry
  • Soft tissue

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Photocephalometry : Errors of projection and landmark location. / Phillips, Ceib; Greer, Jim; Vig, Peter; Matteson, Steve.

In: American Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 86, No. 3, 1984, p. 233-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Phillips, Ceib ; Greer, Jim ; Vig, Peter ; Matteson, Steve. / Photocephalometry : Errors of projection and landmark location. In: American Journal of Orthodontics. 1984 ; Vol. 86, No. 3. pp. 233-243.
@article{8499f4982d5e44499739ebdf1be1e23a,
title = "Photocephalometry: Errors of projection and landmark location",
abstract = "A method called photocephalometry was recently described for the possible soft-tissue evaluation of orthognathic surgery patients by the superimposition of coordinated cephalographs and photographs. A grid analysis was performed to determine the accuracy of the superimposition method. In addition, the reliability of landmark identification was analyzed by the method error of Baumrind and Frantz, using three replicates of twelve patients' photographs. Comparison of twenty-one grid intervals showed that the magnification of the photographic image for any given grid plane is not correlated to that of the radiographic image. Accurate comparisons between soft- and hard-tissue anatomy by simply superimposing the images are not feasible because of the difference in the enlargement factors between the photographs and x-ray films. As was noted by Baumrind and Frantz, a wide range exists in the variability of estimating the location of landmarks. Sixty-six percent of the lateral photographic landmarks and 57{\%} of the frontal landmarks had absolute mean errors for all twelve patients that were less than or equal to 2.0 mm. In general, the envelope of error for most landmarks was not circular. Although the photocephalometric apparatus as described by Hohl and colleagues does not yield the desired quantitative correlation between hard and soft tissues, valuable quantitative information on soft tissue can be easily obtained with the standardization and replication possible with the camera setup and enlarged photographs.",
keywords = "photocephalometry, Soft tissue",
author = "Ceib Phillips and Jim Greer and Peter Vig and Steve Matteson",
year = "1984",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9416(84)90375-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "233--243",
journal = "American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics",
issn = "0889-5406",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Photocephalometry

T2 - Errors of projection and landmark location

AU - Phillips, Ceib

AU - Greer, Jim

AU - Vig, Peter

AU - Matteson, Steve

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - A method called photocephalometry was recently described for the possible soft-tissue evaluation of orthognathic surgery patients by the superimposition of coordinated cephalographs and photographs. A grid analysis was performed to determine the accuracy of the superimposition method. In addition, the reliability of landmark identification was analyzed by the method error of Baumrind and Frantz, using three replicates of twelve patients' photographs. Comparison of twenty-one grid intervals showed that the magnification of the photographic image for any given grid plane is not correlated to that of the radiographic image. Accurate comparisons between soft- and hard-tissue anatomy by simply superimposing the images are not feasible because of the difference in the enlargement factors between the photographs and x-ray films. As was noted by Baumrind and Frantz, a wide range exists in the variability of estimating the location of landmarks. Sixty-six percent of the lateral photographic landmarks and 57% of the frontal landmarks had absolute mean errors for all twelve patients that were less than or equal to 2.0 mm. In general, the envelope of error for most landmarks was not circular. Although the photocephalometric apparatus as described by Hohl and colleagues does not yield the desired quantitative correlation between hard and soft tissues, valuable quantitative information on soft tissue can be easily obtained with the standardization and replication possible with the camera setup and enlarged photographs.

AB - A method called photocephalometry was recently described for the possible soft-tissue evaluation of orthognathic surgery patients by the superimposition of coordinated cephalographs and photographs. A grid analysis was performed to determine the accuracy of the superimposition method. In addition, the reliability of landmark identification was analyzed by the method error of Baumrind and Frantz, using three replicates of twelve patients' photographs. Comparison of twenty-one grid intervals showed that the magnification of the photographic image for any given grid plane is not correlated to that of the radiographic image. Accurate comparisons between soft- and hard-tissue anatomy by simply superimposing the images are not feasible because of the difference in the enlargement factors between the photographs and x-ray films. As was noted by Baumrind and Frantz, a wide range exists in the variability of estimating the location of landmarks. Sixty-six percent of the lateral photographic landmarks and 57% of the frontal landmarks had absolute mean errors for all twelve patients that were less than or equal to 2.0 mm. In general, the envelope of error for most landmarks was not circular. Although the photocephalometric apparatus as described by Hohl and colleagues does not yield the desired quantitative correlation between hard and soft tissues, valuable quantitative information on soft tissue can be easily obtained with the standardization and replication possible with the camera setup and enlarged photographs.

KW - photocephalometry

KW - Soft tissue

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021491554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021491554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9416(84)90375-0

DO - 10.1016/0002-9416(84)90375-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 6591803

AN - SCOPUS:0021491554

VL - 86

SP - 233

EP - 243

JO - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

JF - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SN - 0889-5406

IS - 3

ER -