Peripheral blood CD34 count in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: A prospective evaluation of prognostic value in 94 patients

Brijesh Arora, Shireen Sirhan, James D. Hoyer, Ruben A. Mesa, Ayalew Tefferi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

In a prospective study, peripheral blood (PB) CD34 count, bone marrow histology and other clinical parameters were concurrently evaluated in 94 patients with myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) and the study cohort followed for a minimum of 3 years. Median PB CD34 count was 0.0547 × 109/1 (range 0.5-345 × 109/1) with 86% of the patients displaying above normal levels (>0.005 × 109/l). In a multivariate analysis, only leucocyte count and PB blast percentage correlated with PB CD34 count in an independent and consistent fashion. After a median follow up of 41 months from PB CD34 analysis, 43 patients (46%) have died with a projected 5-year survival of 50%. In a univariate analysis, PB CD34 count above 0.1 × 109/l correlated significantly with shortened survival, leukaemic transformation and clinical progression. However, such statistical significance was lost during multivariate analysis, which identified only anaemia and leucocytosis as independent risk factors for shortened survival. Furthermore, sequential analysis of PB CD34 count was performed in 53 patients and 43% of those who progressed clinically did not display a concomitant rise in their PB CD34 count. The current prospective study does not support an independent prognostic value for PB CD34 count in MMM.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)42-48
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Haematology
Volume128
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • CD34 count
  • Myelofibrosis
  • Prognosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Peripheral blood CD34 count in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: A prospective evaluation of prognostic value in 94 patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this