“Peri-Implantitis”: A Complication of a Foreign Body or a Man-Made “Disease”. Facts and Fiction

Tomas Albrektsson, Luigi Canullo, David L Cochran, Hugo De Bruyn

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The discrepancy between some scientific views and the daily clinical experience with dental implants has made the topic of “periimplantitis” highly controversial, especially the discussion whether “periimplantitis” should even be considered a “disease” or whether marginal bone loss instead would represent a complication of having a foreign body placed in the oral cavity. Purpose: The aim of the present paper was to present the outcomes from a consensus meeting on “peri-implantitis” in Rome, Italy (January 8–10, 2016). Materials and Methods: Seventeen clinical scientists were invited to, based on prepared reviews of the literature, discuss topics related to “periimplantitis.”. Results and conclusions: Oral implants may lose bone or even display clinical failure. However, progressive bone loss threatening implant survival is rare and limited to a percent or two of all implants followed up over 10 years or more, provided that controlled implant systems are being used by properly trained clinicians. There is very little evidence pointing to implants suffering from a defined disease entity entitled “peri-implantitis.” Marginal bone loss around implants is in the great majority of cases associated with immune-osteolytic reactions. Complicating factors include patient genetic disorders, patient smoking, cement or impression material remnants in the peri-implant sulcus, bacterial contamination of the implant components and technical issues such as loose screws, mobile components or fractured materials. These reactions combine to result in cellular responses with the end result being a shift in the delicate balance between the osteoblast and the osteoclast resulting in bone resorption. However, the great majority of controlled implants display a foreign body equilibrium resulting in very high survival rates of the implants over long term of follow-up.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)840-849
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

Peri-Implantitis
Foreign Bodies
Bone and Bones
Inborn Genetic Diseases
Dental Implants
Osteoclasts
Bone Resorption
Osteoblasts
Italy
Mouth
Consensus
Survival Rate
Smoking
Survival

Keywords

  • clinical research
  • crestal bone loss
  • implant surface
  • inflammation
  • periimplantitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

“Peri-Implantitis” : A Complication of a Foreign Body or a Man-Made “Disease”. Facts and Fiction. / Albrektsson, Tomas; Canullo, Luigi; Cochran, David L; De Bruyn, Hugo.

In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Vol. 18, No. 4, 01.08.2016, p. 840-849.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{514fb1a79e4e4b6288da37568cf6b957,
title = "“Peri-Implantitis”: A Complication of a Foreign Body or a Man-Made “Disease”. Facts and Fiction",
abstract = "Background: The discrepancy between some scientific views and the daily clinical experience with dental implants has made the topic of “periimplantitis” highly controversial, especially the discussion whether “periimplantitis” should even be considered a “disease” or whether marginal bone loss instead would represent a complication of having a foreign body placed in the oral cavity. Purpose: The aim of the present paper was to present the outcomes from a consensus meeting on “peri-implantitis” in Rome, Italy (January 8–10, 2016). Materials and Methods: Seventeen clinical scientists were invited to, based on prepared reviews of the literature, discuss topics related to “periimplantitis.”. Results and conclusions: Oral implants may lose bone or even display clinical failure. However, progressive bone loss threatening implant survival is rare and limited to a percent or two of all implants followed up over 10 years or more, provided that controlled implant systems are being used by properly trained clinicians. There is very little evidence pointing to implants suffering from a defined disease entity entitled “peri-implantitis.” Marginal bone loss around implants is in the great majority of cases associated with immune-osteolytic reactions. Complicating factors include patient genetic disorders, patient smoking, cement or impression material remnants in the peri-implant sulcus, bacterial contamination of the implant components and technical issues such as loose screws, mobile components or fractured materials. These reactions combine to result in cellular responses with the end result being a shift in the delicate balance between the osteoblast and the osteoclast resulting in bone resorption. However, the great majority of controlled implants display a foreign body equilibrium resulting in very high survival rates of the implants over long term of follow-up.",
keywords = "clinical research, crestal bone loss, implant surface, inflammation, periimplantitis",
author = "Tomas Albrektsson and Luigi Canullo and Cochran, {David L} and {De Bruyn}, Hugo",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cid.12427",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "840--849",
journal = "Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research",
issn = "1523-0899",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Peri-Implantitis”

T2 - A Complication of a Foreign Body or a Man-Made “Disease”. Facts and Fiction

AU - Albrektsson, Tomas

AU - Canullo, Luigi

AU - Cochran, David L

AU - De Bruyn, Hugo

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Background: The discrepancy between some scientific views and the daily clinical experience with dental implants has made the topic of “periimplantitis” highly controversial, especially the discussion whether “periimplantitis” should even be considered a “disease” or whether marginal bone loss instead would represent a complication of having a foreign body placed in the oral cavity. Purpose: The aim of the present paper was to present the outcomes from a consensus meeting on “peri-implantitis” in Rome, Italy (January 8–10, 2016). Materials and Methods: Seventeen clinical scientists were invited to, based on prepared reviews of the literature, discuss topics related to “periimplantitis.”. Results and conclusions: Oral implants may lose bone or even display clinical failure. However, progressive bone loss threatening implant survival is rare and limited to a percent or two of all implants followed up over 10 years or more, provided that controlled implant systems are being used by properly trained clinicians. There is very little evidence pointing to implants suffering from a defined disease entity entitled “peri-implantitis.” Marginal bone loss around implants is in the great majority of cases associated with immune-osteolytic reactions. Complicating factors include patient genetic disorders, patient smoking, cement or impression material remnants in the peri-implant sulcus, bacterial contamination of the implant components and technical issues such as loose screws, mobile components or fractured materials. These reactions combine to result in cellular responses with the end result being a shift in the delicate balance between the osteoblast and the osteoclast resulting in bone resorption. However, the great majority of controlled implants display a foreign body equilibrium resulting in very high survival rates of the implants over long term of follow-up.

AB - Background: The discrepancy between some scientific views and the daily clinical experience with dental implants has made the topic of “periimplantitis” highly controversial, especially the discussion whether “periimplantitis” should even be considered a “disease” or whether marginal bone loss instead would represent a complication of having a foreign body placed in the oral cavity. Purpose: The aim of the present paper was to present the outcomes from a consensus meeting on “peri-implantitis” in Rome, Italy (January 8–10, 2016). Materials and Methods: Seventeen clinical scientists were invited to, based on prepared reviews of the literature, discuss topics related to “periimplantitis.”. Results and conclusions: Oral implants may lose bone or even display clinical failure. However, progressive bone loss threatening implant survival is rare and limited to a percent or two of all implants followed up over 10 years or more, provided that controlled implant systems are being used by properly trained clinicians. There is very little evidence pointing to implants suffering from a defined disease entity entitled “peri-implantitis.” Marginal bone loss around implants is in the great majority of cases associated with immune-osteolytic reactions. Complicating factors include patient genetic disorders, patient smoking, cement or impression material remnants in the peri-implant sulcus, bacterial contamination of the implant components and technical issues such as loose screws, mobile components or fractured materials. These reactions combine to result in cellular responses with the end result being a shift in the delicate balance between the osteoblast and the osteoclast resulting in bone resorption. However, the great majority of controlled implants display a foreign body equilibrium resulting in very high survival rates of the implants over long term of follow-up.

KW - clinical research

KW - crestal bone loss

KW - implant surface

KW - inflammation

KW - periimplantitis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979226349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979226349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cid.12427

DO - 10.1111/cid.12427

M3 - Review article

C2 - 27238274

AN - SCOPUS:84979226349

VL - 18

SP - 840

EP - 849

JO - Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

JF - Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

SN - 1523-0899

IS - 4

ER -