Percutaneous removal of caliceal and other 'inaccessible' stones: Results

P. K. Reddy, P. H. Lange, J. C. Hulbert, R. V. Clayman, J. F. Breen, D. H. Hunter, C. C. Coleman, W. R. Castaneda-Zuniga, K. Amplatz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Percutaneous removal of renal stones (percutaneous nephrolithotomy) is becoming an established procedure, especially for stones lying free in the renal pelvis. However, some renal stones, particularly caliceal stones, are less accessible and, therefore, more difficult by the percutaneous route. We removed percutaneously 95 caliceal or otherwise poorly accessible renal stones from 53 patients with a variety of techniques, including percutaneous puncture above the 12th rib, double or Y percutaneous nephrostomy tracts, rigid and flexible endoscopy, and intrarenal cutting with diathermy. Intravenously assisted local anesthesia was used exclusively in 89 per cent of the patients. Status free of stones was achieved in all but 1 patient who retained 2 small fragments. The average number of sessions was 1.89 and the average hospital stay was 7.9 days. Complications were minor except for 1 patient who required tertiary renal artery embolization for bleeding. Illustrative cases are presented. Virtually all renal stones can be removed percutaneously.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)443-447
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume132
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Percutaneous removal of caliceal and other 'inaccessible' stones: Results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this