TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient and healthcare provider factors influencing shared clinical decision-making for HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccination among adults aged 27–45 years old in the United States
T2 - a systematic review
AU - Taskin, Tanjila
AU - Akpan, Idara N.
AU - Maynard, Grace
AU - Alkhatib, Sarah A.
AU - Wheldon, Christopher W.
AU - Grace, Jessica
AU - Thompson, Erika L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Aim: The United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended shared clinical decision-making for mid-adult HPV vaccination. However, healthcare practitioners and patients struggle with shared clinical decision-making (SCDM) due to unclear guidelines. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify factors contributing to decision-making for HPV vaccination among US mid-adults aged 27 - 45 and factors that influence healthcare providers implementing this guideline. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and the Web of Science were searched for peer-reviewed articles published in English between 2006 and 2022. Fourteen articles were included in this review. The Anderson’s healthcare utilization model was used to synthesize the results into predisposing, enabling, and need-based factors. Results: The predisposing factors that positively influenced HPV vaccination were being male, having a graduate degree, and having HPV knowledge. Enabling factors that positively influenced HPV vaccination were having health insurance, healthcare provider recommendations, access to health care services, a trusted source for information, financial support, and emotional support. Need-based factors that positively influenced HPV vaccination were perceived cancer risk, prior HPV infection, reducing HPV-related morbidities, and improving physical health. Healthcare providers were more likely to recommend the vaccine if they were aware of the ACIP guideline, and for patients who were younger, in a relationship, or had more than one sexual partner, had health insurance, and had a history of high-grade HPV infection. Conclusion: The review suggests routine provider training and developing patient decision-aid tools to facilitate the shared clinical decision-making process for increasing HPV vaccination in this age group.
AB - Aim: The United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended shared clinical decision-making for mid-adult HPV vaccination. However, healthcare practitioners and patients struggle with shared clinical decision-making (SCDM) due to unclear guidelines. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify factors contributing to decision-making for HPV vaccination among US mid-adults aged 27 - 45 and factors that influence healthcare providers implementing this guideline. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and the Web of Science were searched for peer-reviewed articles published in English between 2006 and 2022. Fourteen articles were included in this review. The Anderson’s healthcare utilization model was used to synthesize the results into predisposing, enabling, and need-based factors. Results: The predisposing factors that positively influenced HPV vaccination were being male, having a graduate degree, and having HPV knowledge. Enabling factors that positively influenced HPV vaccination were having health insurance, healthcare provider recommendations, access to health care services, a trusted source for information, financial support, and emotional support. Need-based factors that positively influenced HPV vaccination were perceived cancer risk, prior HPV infection, reducing HPV-related morbidities, and improving physical health. Healthcare providers were more likely to recommend the vaccine if they were aware of the ACIP guideline, and for patients who were younger, in a relationship, or had more than one sexual partner, had health insurance, and had a history of high-grade HPV infection. Conclusion: The review suggests routine provider training and developing patient decision-aid tools to facilitate the shared clinical decision-making process for increasing HPV vaccination in this age group.
KW - Guidelines
KW - HPV vaccination
KW - Mid-adults
KW - Providers
KW - Shared clinical decision-making
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105002470988
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105002470988#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1007/s10389-025-02462-9
DO - 10.1007/s10389-025-02462-9
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105002470988
SN - 2198-1833
JO - Journal of Public Health (Germany)
JF - Journal of Public Health (Germany)
ER -