TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of a scholarly activity curriculum for family medicine residents
AU - Ravi, Tharani
AU - Cruz, Inez
AU - Ali, Fozia
AU - Burge, Sandra
AU - Wood, Robert
AU - Rodriguez, Jasmine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Society of Teachers of Family Medicine. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Scholarship is essential to growth and innovation in family medicine. Moreover, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Review Committee-Family Medicine requires family medicine residents to complete scholarly activities. However, many residents lack the training and confidence to successfully conduct such activities. In the year 2014, our residency implemented a scholarly activity curriculum to train our residents to plan, complete, and disseminate research and quality improvement projects. We sought to evaluate the impact of one institution’s scholarly activity curriculum for family medicine residents on resident scholarly activity productivity. METHODS: We reviewed the scholarly activities conducted by our family medicine residents in the 5 years after initiation of the scholarly activity curriculum and compared them to those conducted in the 5 years prior to initiation of the curriculum. RESULTS: Since 2014, the percentage of residents who coauthored at least one poster increased significantly, from 55.2% in 2009-2014, to 82.5% in 2014-2019 (P<.001). In the academic years 2014 to 2019, residents also coauthored significantly more book chapters compared to the 5 years prior to the curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: Our curriculum has been successful in improving resident scholarly activity productivity as evidenced by a significant increase in the percentage of residents coauthoring posters and the total number of book chapters written by residents.
AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Scholarship is essential to growth and innovation in family medicine. Moreover, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Review Committee-Family Medicine requires family medicine residents to complete scholarly activities. However, many residents lack the training and confidence to successfully conduct such activities. In the year 2014, our residency implemented a scholarly activity curriculum to train our residents to plan, complete, and disseminate research and quality improvement projects. We sought to evaluate the impact of one institution’s scholarly activity curriculum for family medicine residents on resident scholarly activity productivity. METHODS: We reviewed the scholarly activities conducted by our family medicine residents in the 5 years after initiation of the scholarly activity curriculum and compared them to those conducted in the 5 years prior to initiation of the curriculum. RESULTS: Since 2014, the percentage of residents who coauthored at least one poster increased significantly, from 55.2% in 2009-2014, to 82.5% in 2014-2019 (P<.001). In the academic years 2014 to 2019, residents also coauthored significantly more book chapters compared to the 5 years prior to the curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: Our curriculum has been successful in improving resident scholarly activity productivity as evidenced by a significant increase in the percentage of residents coauthoring posters and the total number of book chapters written by residents.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104170653&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104170653&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.22454/FamMed.2021.812680
DO - 10.22454/FamMed.2021.812680
M3 - Article
C2 - 33887051
AN - SCOPUS:85104170653
SN - 0742-3225
VL - 53
SP - 285
EP - 288
JO - Family medicine
JF - Family medicine
IS - 4
ER -