TY - JOUR
T1 - Obesity diagnosis and care practices in the veterans health administration
AU - Noël, Polly Hitchcock
AU - Copeland, Laurel A.
AU - Pugh, Mary Jo
AU - Kahwati, Leila
AU - Tsevat, Joel
AU - Nelson, Karin
AU - Wang, Chen Pin
AU - Bollinger, Mary J.
AU - Hazuda, Helen P
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements: The research reported here was supported by the Department of Veteran Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service (project no. IIR 05–121). Dr. Noël is a Research Psychologist at the South Texas Veterans Health Care System. The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Funding Information:
Conflict of Interest: The research reported here was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service (project no. IIR 05–121). The funding agency provided support to conduct this study, including collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, and preparation of the manuscript, but has not participated in manuscript development, and has not reviewed or approved this manuscript. The authors have no conflict of interests to declare. Sources of support for the authors for the past 3 years are listed below: Dept. of Veterans Affairs: Noël, Copeland, Pugh, Kahwati, Tsevat, Nelson, Wang, Bollinger UT Health Science Center: Noël, Copeland, Pugh, Hazuda, Wang University of Cincinnati: Tsevat University of Washington: Nelson NIH: Noël, Copeland, Pugh, Wang, Nelson, Tsevat CDC: Pugh Epilepsy Foundation: Pugh Abbott Laboratories: Pugh Corresponding Author: Polly Hitchcock Noël, PhD; VERDICT/ South Texas Veterans Health Care System, 7400 Merton Minter Blvd (11C6), San Antonio, TX 78229-4404, USA (e-mail: noelp@ uthscsa.edu).
Funding Information:
The research reported here was supported by the Department of Veteran Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service (project no. IIR 05–121). Dr. Noël is a Research Psychologist at the South Texas Veterans Health Care System. The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
PY - 2010/6
Y1 - 2010/6
N2 - Background: In response to dramatic increases in obesity prevalence, clinical guidelines urge health care providers to prevent and treat obesity more aggressively. OBJECTIVE: To describe the proportion of obese primary care patients receiving obesity care over a 5-year period and identify factors predicting receipt of care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study utilizing VHA administrative data from 6 of 21 VA administrative regions. PATIENTS: Veterans seen in primary care in FY2002 with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m 2 based on heights and weights recorded in the electronic medical record (EMR), survival through FY2006, and active care (1 or more visits in at least 3 follow-up years FY2003-2006). MAIN MEASURES: Receipt of outpatient visits for individual or group education or instruction in nutrition, exercise, or weight management; receipt of prescriptions for any FDA-approved medications for weight reduction; and receipt of bariatric surgery. KEY Results: Of 933,084 (88.6%) of 1,053,228 primary care patients who had recorded heights and weights allowing calculation of BMI, 330,802 (35.5%) met criteria for obesity. Among obese patients who survived and received active care (N=264,667), 53.5% had a recorded obesity diagnosis, 34.1% received at least one outpatient visit for obesity-related education or counseling, 0.4% received weight-loss medications, and 0.2% had bariatric surgery between FY2002-FY2006. In multivariable analysis, patients older than 65 years (OR=0.62; 95% CI: 0.60-0.64) were less likely to receive obesity-related education, whereas those prescribed 5-7 or 8 or more medication classes (OR= 1.41; 1.38-1.45; OR=1.94; 1.88-2.00, respectively) or diagnosed with obesity (OR=4.0; 3.92-4.08) or diabetes (OR=2.23; 2.18-2.27) were more likely to receive obesity-related education. Conclusions: Substantial numbers of VHA primary care patients did not have sufficient height or weight data recorded to calculate BMI or have recorded obesity diagnoses when warranted. Receipt of obesity education varied by sociodemographic and clinical factors; providers may need to be cognizant of these when engaging patients in treatment.
AB - Background: In response to dramatic increases in obesity prevalence, clinical guidelines urge health care providers to prevent and treat obesity more aggressively. OBJECTIVE: To describe the proportion of obese primary care patients receiving obesity care over a 5-year period and identify factors predicting receipt of care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study utilizing VHA administrative data from 6 of 21 VA administrative regions. PATIENTS: Veterans seen in primary care in FY2002 with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m 2 based on heights and weights recorded in the electronic medical record (EMR), survival through FY2006, and active care (1 or more visits in at least 3 follow-up years FY2003-2006). MAIN MEASURES: Receipt of outpatient visits for individual or group education or instruction in nutrition, exercise, or weight management; receipt of prescriptions for any FDA-approved medications for weight reduction; and receipt of bariatric surgery. KEY Results: Of 933,084 (88.6%) of 1,053,228 primary care patients who had recorded heights and weights allowing calculation of BMI, 330,802 (35.5%) met criteria for obesity. Among obese patients who survived and received active care (N=264,667), 53.5% had a recorded obesity diagnosis, 34.1% received at least one outpatient visit for obesity-related education or counseling, 0.4% received weight-loss medications, and 0.2% had bariatric surgery between FY2002-FY2006. In multivariable analysis, patients older than 65 years (OR=0.62; 95% CI: 0.60-0.64) were less likely to receive obesity-related education, whereas those prescribed 5-7 or 8 or more medication classes (OR= 1.41; 1.38-1.45; OR=1.94; 1.88-2.00, respectively) or diagnosed with obesity (OR=4.0; 3.92-4.08) or diabetes (OR=2.23; 2.18-2.27) were more likely to receive obesity-related education. Conclusions: Substantial numbers of VHA primary care patients did not have sufficient height or weight data recorded to calculate BMI or have recorded obesity diagnoses when warranted. Receipt of obesity education varied by sociodemographic and clinical factors; providers may need to be cognizant of these when engaging patients in treatment.
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Health services research
KW - Obesity
KW - Patient education
KW - Veterans
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955086879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955086879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-010-1279-z
DO - 10.1007/s11606-010-1279-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 20180155
AN - SCOPUS:77955086879
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 25
SP - 510
EP - 516
JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine
JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine
IS - 6
ER -