Obesity classification in military personnel: A comparison of body fat, waist circumference, and body mass index measurements

  • Katie M. Heinrich
  • , Nattinee Jitnarin
  • , Richard R. Suminski
  • , La Verne Berkel
  • , Christine M. Hunter
  • , Lisa Alvarez
  • , Antionette R. Brundige
  • , Alan L. Peterson
  • , John P. Foreyt
  • , C. Keith Haddock
  • , Walker S.C. Poston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate obesity classifications from body fat percentage (BF%), body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC). Methods: A total of 451 overweight/obese active duty military personnel completed all three assessments. Results: Most were obese (men, 81%; women, 98%) using National Institutes of Health (NIH) BF% standards (men, >25%; women, >30%). Using the higher World Health Organization (WHO) BF >35% standard, 86% of women were obese. BMI (55.5% and 51.4%) and WC (21.4% and 31.9%) obesity rates were substantially lower for men and women, respectively (p < 0.05). BMI/WC were accurate discriminators for BF% obesity (θ for all comparisons >0.75, p < 0.001). Optimal cutoff points were lower than NIH/WHO standards; WC = 100 cm and BMI = 29 maximized sensitivity and specificity for men, and WC = 79 cm and BMI = 25.5 (NIH) or WC = 83 cm and BMI = 26 (WHO) maximized sensitivity and specificity for women. Conclusions: Both WC and BMI measures had high rates of false negatives compared to BF%. However, at a population level, WC/BMI are useful obesity measures, demonstrating fair-to-high discriminatory power.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-73
Number of pages7
JournalMilitary medicine
Volume173
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Obesity classification in military personnel: A comparison of body fat, waist circumference, and body mass index measurements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this