Normative Data for the Cognitively Intact Oldest-Old: The Framingham Heart Study

Ivy N. Miller, Jayandra J. Himali, Alexa S. Beiser, Joanne M. Murabito, Sudha Seshadri, Philip A. Wolf, Rhoda Au

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Study Context: The number of individuals who reach extreme age is quickly increasing. Much of the current literature focuses on impaired cognition in extreme age, and debate continues regarding what constitutes "normal" cognition in extreme age. This study aimed to provide oldest-old normative data and to compare cognitive performances of cognitively intact elderly individuals from the Framingham Heart Study. Methods: A total of 1302 individuals aged 65+ years from the Framingham Heart Study were separated into 5-year age bands and compared on cognitive tests. Multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for gender, the Wide Range Achievement Test - Third Edition (WRAT-III) Reading score, and cohort. Analyses also included comparisons between 418 individuals aged 80+ and 884 individuals aged 65-79, and comparisons within oldest-old age bands. Results: Normative data for all participants are presented. Significant differences were found on most tests between age groups in the overall analysis between young-old and oldest-old, and analysis of oldest-old age bands also revealed select significant differences (all ps <.05). Conclusion: As aging increases, significant cognitive differences and increased variability in performances are evident. These results support the use of age-appropriate normative data for oldest-old individuals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)386-409
Number of pages24
JournalExperimental Aging Research
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cognition
Reading
Linear Models
Age Groups
Regression Analysis
Old Age
Cognitive Performance
Achievement Tests
Linear Regression
Cohort

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aging
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Miller, I. N., Himali, J. J., Beiser, A. S., Murabito, J. M., Seshadri, S., Wolf, P. A., & Au, R. (2015). Normative Data for the Cognitively Intact Oldest-Old: The Framingham Heart Study. Experimental Aging Research, 41(4), 386-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2015.1053755

Normative Data for the Cognitively Intact Oldest-Old : The Framingham Heart Study. / Miller, Ivy N.; Himali, Jayandra J.; Beiser, Alexa S.; Murabito, Joanne M.; Seshadri, Sudha; Wolf, Philip A.; Au, Rhoda.

In: Experimental Aging Research, Vol. 41, No. 4, 01.01.2015, p. 386-409.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miller, Ivy N. ; Himali, Jayandra J. ; Beiser, Alexa S. ; Murabito, Joanne M. ; Seshadri, Sudha ; Wolf, Philip A. ; Au, Rhoda. / Normative Data for the Cognitively Intact Oldest-Old : The Framingham Heart Study. In: Experimental Aging Research. 2015 ; Vol. 41, No. 4. pp. 386-409.
@article{7b6476a32f1f487a906e6ccbf7cd3e19,
title = "Normative Data for the Cognitively Intact Oldest-Old: The Framingham Heart Study",
abstract = "Background/Study Context: The number of individuals who reach extreme age is quickly increasing. Much of the current literature focuses on impaired cognition in extreme age, and debate continues regarding what constitutes {"}normal{"} cognition in extreme age. This study aimed to provide oldest-old normative data and to compare cognitive performances of cognitively intact elderly individuals from the Framingham Heart Study. Methods: A total of 1302 individuals aged 65+ years from the Framingham Heart Study were separated into 5-year age bands and compared on cognitive tests. Multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for gender, the Wide Range Achievement Test - Third Edition (WRAT-III) Reading score, and cohort. Analyses also included comparisons between 418 individuals aged 80+ and 884 individuals aged 65-79, and comparisons within oldest-old age bands. Results: Normative data for all participants are presented. Significant differences were found on most tests between age groups in the overall analysis between young-old and oldest-old, and analysis of oldest-old age bands also revealed select significant differences (all ps <.05). Conclusion: As aging increases, significant cognitive differences and increased variability in performances are evident. These results support the use of age-appropriate normative data for oldest-old individuals.",
author = "Miller, {Ivy N.} and Himali, {Jayandra J.} and Beiser, {Alexa S.} and Murabito, {Joanne M.} and Sudha Seshadri and Wolf, {Philip A.} and Rhoda Au",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0361073X.2015.1053755",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "386--409",
journal = "Experimental Aging Research",
issn = "0361-073X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Normative Data for the Cognitively Intact Oldest-Old

T2 - The Framingham Heart Study

AU - Miller, Ivy N.

AU - Himali, Jayandra J.

AU - Beiser, Alexa S.

AU - Murabito, Joanne M.

AU - Seshadri, Sudha

AU - Wolf, Philip A.

AU - Au, Rhoda

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background/Study Context: The number of individuals who reach extreme age is quickly increasing. Much of the current literature focuses on impaired cognition in extreme age, and debate continues regarding what constitutes "normal" cognition in extreme age. This study aimed to provide oldest-old normative data and to compare cognitive performances of cognitively intact elderly individuals from the Framingham Heart Study. Methods: A total of 1302 individuals aged 65+ years from the Framingham Heart Study were separated into 5-year age bands and compared on cognitive tests. Multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for gender, the Wide Range Achievement Test - Third Edition (WRAT-III) Reading score, and cohort. Analyses also included comparisons between 418 individuals aged 80+ and 884 individuals aged 65-79, and comparisons within oldest-old age bands. Results: Normative data for all participants are presented. Significant differences were found on most tests between age groups in the overall analysis between young-old and oldest-old, and analysis of oldest-old age bands also revealed select significant differences (all ps <.05). Conclusion: As aging increases, significant cognitive differences and increased variability in performances are evident. These results support the use of age-appropriate normative data for oldest-old individuals.

AB - Background/Study Context: The number of individuals who reach extreme age is quickly increasing. Much of the current literature focuses on impaired cognition in extreme age, and debate continues regarding what constitutes "normal" cognition in extreme age. This study aimed to provide oldest-old normative data and to compare cognitive performances of cognitively intact elderly individuals from the Framingham Heart Study. Methods: A total of 1302 individuals aged 65+ years from the Framingham Heart Study were separated into 5-year age bands and compared on cognitive tests. Multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for gender, the Wide Range Achievement Test - Third Edition (WRAT-III) Reading score, and cohort. Analyses also included comparisons between 418 individuals aged 80+ and 884 individuals aged 65-79, and comparisons within oldest-old age bands. Results: Normative data for all participants are presented. Significant differences were found on most tests between age groups in the overall analysis between young-old and oldest-old, and analysis of oldest-old age bands also revealed select significant differences (all ps <.05). Conclusion: As aging increases, significant cognitive differences and increased variability in performances are evident. These results support the use of age-appropriate normative data for oldest-old individuals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938515317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938515317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0361073X.2015.1053755

DO - 10.1080/0361073X.2015.1053755

M3 - Article

C2 - 26214098

AN - SCOPUS:84938515317

VL - 41

SP - 386

EP - 409

JO - Experimental Aging Research

JF - Experimental Aging Research

SN - 0361-073X

IS - 4

ER -