National Trends in the Management of Urethral Stricture Disease: A 14-Year Survey of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample

Jill C. Buckley, Nishant Patel, Song Wang, Michael A Liss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction Urethral strictures are common in general urology practice and can initially be treated with urethral dilation or incision. Unfortunately, many patients require retreatment. Urethroplasty provides a more durable effect but may be underused. We examined national trends in the management of urethral stricture disease. Methods Using the NIS (Nationwide Inpatient Sample) database from 1998 to 2011 we identified patients with a primary or secondary admitting ICD-9 diagnosis code of 598.X (urethral stricture) and excluded patients with urethral cancer, urethritis, urethral stone, abscess or epispadias. Inpatient procedure codes were used to classify 2 treatment groups, including 1) urethral dilation/incision and 2) urethral reconstruction. Linear regression was performed to determine the change in the utilization rate of incision/dilation and urethral reconstruction per 1,000 urethral strictures with time. Results A total of 240,108 procedures were identified for 471,596 urethral stricture diagnoses upon hospital admission, including 217,869 (90.7%) for incision/dilation and 22,239 (9.3%) for urethral reconstruction/urethrostomy. Mean utilization of incision/dilation per 1,000 strictures decreased slightly by 10.74 per year (1%) (p ≤0.001). Mean utilization of urethral reconstruction increased slightly by 1.65 per year (0.17%) (p = 0.0062). For every 1 increase in urethral reconstruction there were 12 fewer urethral dilations per 1,000 urethral strictures per year. Conclusions Urethral dilation/incision continues to be the foremost management of urethral stricture disease with known high recurrence and failure rates. Patients should be referred for urethral reconstruction to optimize treatment outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)315-320
Number of pages6
JournalUrology Practice
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

Urethral Diseases
Urethral Stricture
Inpatients
Dilatation
Urethral Neoplasms
Epispadias
Urethritis
Retreatment
Urology
International Classification of Diseases
Surveys and Questionnaires
General Practice
Abscess
Linear Models
Pathologic Constriction
Databases
Recurrence

Keywords

  • dilatation
  • morbidity
  • palliative care
  • reconstructive surgical procedures
  • urethral stricture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

National Trends in the Management of Urethral Stricture Disease : A 14-Year Survey of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. / Buckley, Jill C.; Patel, Nishant; Wang, Song; Liss, Michael A.

In: Urology Practice, Vol. 3, No. 4, 01.07.2016, p. 315-320.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{07026c2fd68e4b1ab5eded97793f3e13,
title = "National Trends in the Management of Urethral Stricture Disease: A 14-Year Survey of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample",
abstract = "Introduction Urethral strictures are common in general urology practice and can initially be treated with urethral dilation or incision. Unfortunately, many patients require retreatment. Urethroplasty provides a more durable effect but may be underused. We examined national trends in the management of urethral stricture disease. Methods Using the NIS (Nationwide Inpatient Sample) database from 1998 to 2011 we identified patients with a primary or secondary admitting ICD-9 diagnosis code of 598.X (urethral stricture) and excluded patients with urethral cancer, urethritis, urethral stone, abscess or epispadias. Inpatient procedure codes were used to classify 2 treatment groups, including 1) urethral dilation/incision and 2) urethral reconstruction. Linear regression was performed to determine the change in the utilization rate of incision/dilation and urethral reconstruction per 1,000 urethral strictures with time. Results A total of 240,108 procedures were identified for 471,596 urethral stricture diagnoses upon hospital admission, including 217,869 (90.7{\%}) for incision/dilation and 22,239 (9.3{\%}) for urethral reconstruction/urethrostomy. Mean utilization of incision/dilation per 1,000 strictures decreased slightly by 10.74 per year (1{\%}) (p ≤0.001). Mean utilization of urethral reconstruction increased slightly by 1.65 per year (0.17{\%}) (p = 0.0062). For every 1 increase in urethral reconstruction there were 12 fewer urethral dilations per 1,000 urethral strictures per year. Conclusions Urethral dilation/incision continues to be the foremost management of urethral stricture disease with known high recurrence and failure rates. Patients should be referred for urethral reconstruction to optimize treatment outcomes.",
keywords = "dilatation, morbidity, palliative care, reconstructive surgical procedures, urethral stricture",
author = "Buckley, {Jill C.} and Nishant Patel and Song Wang and Liss, {Michael A}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.urpr.2015.07.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "315--320",
journal = "Urology Practice",
issn = "2352-0779",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - National Trends in the Management of Urethral Stricture Disease

T2 - A 14-Year Survey of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample

AU - Buckley, Jill C.

AU - Patel, Nishant

AU - Wang, Song

AU - Liss, Michael A

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Introduction Urethral strictures are common in general urology practice and can initially be treated with urethral dilation or incision. Unfortunately, many patients require retreatment. Urethroplasty provides a more durable effect but may be underused. We examined national trends in the management of urethral stricture disease. Methods Using the NIS (Nationwide Inpatient Sample) database from 1998 to 2011 we identified patients with a primary or secondary admitting ICD-9 diagnosis code of 598.X (urethral stricture) and excluded patients with urethral cancer, urethritis, urethral stone, abscess or epispadias. Inpatient procedure codes were used to classify 2 treatment groups, including 1) urethral dilation/incision and 2) urethral reconstruction. Linear regression was performed to determine the change in the utilization rate of incision/dilation and urethral reconstruction per 1,000 urethral strictures with time. Results A total of 240,108 procedures were identified for 471,596 urethral stricture diagnoses upon hospital admission, including 217,869 (90.7%) for incision/dilation and 22,239 (9.3%) for urethral reconstruction/urethrostomy. Mean utilization of incision/dilation per 1,000 strictures decreased slightly by 10.74 per year (1%) (p ≤0.001). Mean utilization of urethral reconstruction increased slightly by 1.65 per year (0.17%) (p = 0.0062). For every 1 increase in urethral reconstruction there were 12 fewer urethral dilations per 1,000 urethral strictures per year. Conclusions Urethral dilation/incision continues to be the foremost management of urethral stricture disease with known high recurrence and failure rates. Patients should be referred for urethral reconstruction to optimize treatment outcomes.

AB - Introduction Urethral strictures are common in general urology practice and can initially be treated with urethral dilation or incision. Unfortunately, many patients require retreatment. Urethroplasty provides a more durable effect but may be underused. We examined national trends in the management of urethral stricture disease. Methods Using the NIS (Nationwide Inpatient Sample) database from 1998 to 2011 we identified patients with a primary or secondary admitting ICD-9 diagnosis code of 598.X (urethral stricture) and excluded patients with urethral cancer, urethritis, urethral stone, abscess or epispadias. Inpatient procedure codes were used to classify 2 treatment groups, including 1) urethral dilation/incision and 2) urethral reconstruction. Linear regression was performed to determine the change in the utilization rate of incision/dilation and urethral reconstruction per 1,000 urethral strictures with time. Results A total of 240,108 procedures were identified for 471,596 urethral stricture diagnoses upon hospital admission, including 217,869 (90.7%) for incision/dilation and 22,239 (9.3%) for urethral reconstruction/urethrostomy. Mean utilization of incision/dilation per 1,000 strictures decreased slightly by 10.74 per year (1%) (p ≤0.001). Mean utilization of urethral reconstruction increased slightly by 1.65 per year (0.17%) (p = 0.0062). For every 1 increase in urethral reconstruction there were 12 fewer urethral dilations per 1,000 urethral strictures per year. Conclusions Urethral dilation/incision continues to be the foremost management of urethral stricture disease with known high recurrence and failure rates. Patients should be referred for urethral reconstruction to optimize treatment outcomes.

KW - dilatation

KW - morbidity

KW - palliative care

KW - reconstructive surgical procedures

KW - urethral stricture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971607419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971607419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urpr.2015.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.urpr.2015.07.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84971607419

VL - 3

SP - 315

EP - 320

JO - Urology Practice

JF - Urology Practice

SN - 2352-0779

IS - 4

ER -