MRI evaluation of the urothelial tract: Pitfalls and solutions

Andrew D. Chung, Nicola Schieda, Alampady Krishna Shanbhogue, Marc Dilauro, Andrew B. Rosenkrantz, Evan S. Siegelman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective. MR urography (MRU) can be an alternative to CT urography (CTU) for imaging of the kidneys, urinary bladder, and collecting systems. MRU can be a challenging examination to perform and interpret, which may result in technical and interpretive errors being made. This article highlights the pitfalls associated with MRU and discusses how to recognize and avoid them. CONCLUSION. When performed properly, MRU may provide imaging quality generally comparable to that of CTU, and it enables comprehensive evaluation of the entire urinary tract.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)W108-W116
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume207
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2016

Keywords

  • Gadolinium
  • Kidney
  • MR urography
  • MRI
  • Urinary bladder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'MRI evaluation of the urothelial tract: Pitfalls and solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this