MRI evaluation of the urothelial tract: Pitfalls and solutions

Andrew D. Chung; Nicola Schieda; Alampady Krishna Shanbhogue; Marc Dilauro; Andrew B. Rosenkrantz; Evan S. Siegelman

doi:10.2214/AJR.16.16348

MRI evaluation of the urothelial tract: Pitfalls and solutions

Andrew D. Chung, Nicola Schieda, Alampady Krishna Shanbhogue, Marc Dilauro, Andrew B. Rosenkrantz, Evan S. Siegelman

Radiology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective. MR urography (MRU) can be an alternative to CT urography (CTU) for imaging of the kidneys, urinary bladder, and collecting systems. MRU can be a challenging examination to perform and interpret, which may result in technical and interpretive errors being made. This article highlights the pitfalls associated with MRU and discusses how to recognize and avoid them. CONCLUSION. When performed properly, MRU may provide imaging quality generally comparable to that of CTU, and it enables comprehensive evaluation of the entire urinary tract.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	W108-W116
Journal	American Journal of Roentgenology
Volume	207
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.16348
State	Published - Dec 2016

Keywords

Gadolinium
Kidney
MR urography
MRI
Urinary bladder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Access to Document

10.2214/AJR.16.16348

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'MRI evaluation of the urothelial tract: Pitfalls and solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{e05aa621e1d24c1c850f649782e83898,

title = "MRI evaluation of the urothelial tract: Pitfalls and solutions",

abstract = "Objective. MR urography (MRU) can be an alternative to CT urography (CTU) for imaging of the kidneys, urinary bladder, and collecting systems. MRU can be a challenging examination to perform and interpret, which may result in technical and interpretive errors being made. This article highlights the pitfalls associated with MRU and discusses how to recognize and avoid them. CONCLUSION. When performed properly, MRU may provide imaging quality generally comparable to that of CTU, and it enables comprehensive evaluation of the entire urinary tract.",

keywords = "Gadolinium, Kidney, MR urography, MRI, Urinary bladder",

author = "Chung, {Andrew D.} and Nicola Schieda and Shanbhogue, {Alampady Krishna} and Marc Dilauro and Rosenkrantz, {Andrew B.} and Siegelman, {Evan S.}",

year = "2016",

month = dec,

doi = "10.2214/AJR.16.16348",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "207",

pages = "W108--W116",

journal = "AJR. American journal of roentgenology",

issn = "0361-803X",

publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MRI evaluation of the urothelial tract

T2 - Pitfalls and solutions

AU - Chung, Andrew D.

AU - Schieda, Nicola

AU - Shanbhogue, Alampady Krishna

AU - Dilauro, Marc

AU - Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.

AU - Siegelman, Evan S.

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - Objective. MR urography (MRU) can be an alternative to CT urography (CTU) for imaging of the kidneys, urinary bladder, and collecting systems. MRU can be a challenging examination to perform and interpret, which may result in technical and interpretive errors being made. This article highlights the pitfalls associated with MRU and discusses how to recognize and avoid them. CONCLUSION. When performed properly, MRU may provide imaging quality generally comparable to that of CTU, and it enables comprehensive evaluation of the entire urinary tract.

AB - Objective. MR urography (MRU) can be an alternative to CT urography (CTU) for imaging of the kidneys, urinary bladder, and collecting systems. MRU can be a challenging examination to perform and interpret, which may result in technical and interpretive errors being made. This article highlights the pitfalls associated with MRU and discusses how to recognize and avoid them. CONCLUSION. When performed properly, MRU may provide imaging quality generally comparable to that of CTU, and it enables comprehensive evaluation of the entire urinary tract.

KW - Gadolinium

KW - Kidney

KW - MR urography

KW - MRI

KW - Urinary bladder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84999208639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84999208639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.16.16348

DO - 10.2214/AJR.16.16348

M3 - Article

C2 - 27611739

AN - SCOPUS:84999208639

VL - 207

SP - W108-W116

JO - AJR. American journal of roentgenology

JF - AJR. American journal of roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 6

ER -