Monte Carlo determination of radiation-induced cancer risks for prostate patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy

Sotirios Stathakis, Jinsheng Li, Charlie C M Ma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The application of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has enabled the delivery of high doses to the target volume while sparing the surrounding normal tissues. The drawbacks of intensity modulation, as implemented using a computer-controlled multileaf collimator (MLC), are the larger number of monitor units (MUs) and longer beam-on time as compared with conventional radiotherapy. Additionally, IMRT uses more beam directions - typically 5-9 for prostate treatment - to achieve highly conformal dose and normal-tissue sparing. In the present work, we study radiation-induced cancer risks attributable to IMRT delivery using MLC for prostate patients. Whole-body computed tomography scans were used in our study to calculate (according to report no. 116 from the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements) the effective dose equivalent received by individual organs. We used EGS4 and MCSIM to compute the dose for IMRT and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. The effects of collimator rotation, distance from the treatment field, and scatter and leakage contribution to the Whole-body dose were investigated. We calculated the whole-body dose equivalent to estimate the increase in the risk of secondary malignancies. Our results showed an overall doubling in the risk of secondary malignancies from the application of IMRT as compared with conventional radiotherapy. This increase in the risk of secondary malignancies is not necessarily related to a relative increase in MUs. The whole-body dose equivalent was also affected by collimator rotation, field size, and the energy of the photon beam. Smaller field sizes of low-energy photon beams (that is, 6 MV) with the MLC axis along the lateral axis of the patient resulted in the lowest whole-body dose. Our results can be used to evaluate the risk of secondary malignancies for prostate IMRT patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-27
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Volume8
Issue number4
StatePublished - Sep 2007

Fingerprint

Radiation-Induced Neoplasms
Radiotherapy
radiation therapy
Prostatic Neoplasms
cancer
Radiation
collimators
dosage
radiation
Prostate
Photons
photon beams
Neoplasms
Dosimetry
delivery
Conformal Radiotherapy
Tissue
Radiation Protection
Radiation protection
radiation measurement

Keywords

  • IMRT
  • Prostate radiation therapy
  • Secondary malignancies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation
  • Instrumentation

Cite this

Monte Carlo determination of radiation-induced cancer risks for prostate patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy. / Stathakis, Sotirios; Li, Jinsheng; Ma, Charlie C M.

In: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Vol. 8, No. 4, 09.2007, p. 14-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c2d0720dc2e34871ae380ab27019ad7d,
title = "Monte Carlo determination of radiation-induced cancer risks for prostate patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy",
abstract = "The application of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has enabled the delivery of high doses to the target volume while sparing the surrounding normal tissues. The drawbacks of intensity modulation, as implemented using a computer-controlled multileaf collimator (MLC), are the larger number of monitor units (MUs) and longer beam-on time as compared with conventional radiotherapy. Additionally, IMRT uses more beam directions - typically 5-9 for prostate treatment - to achieve highly conformal dose and normal-tissue sparing. In the present work, we study radiation-induced cancer risks attributable to IMRT delivery using MLC for prostate patients. Whole-body computed tomography scans were used in our study to calculate (according to report no. 116 from the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements) the effective dose equivalent received by individual organs. We used EGS4 and MCSIM to compute the dose for IMRT and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. The effects of collimator rotation, distance from the treatment field, and scatter and leakage contribution to the Whole-body dose were investigated. We calculated the whole-body dose equivalent to estimate the increase in the risk of secondary malignancies. Our results showed an overall doubling in the risk of secondary malignancies from the application of IMRT as compared with conventional radiotherapy. This increase in the risk of secondary malignancies is not necessarily related to a relative increase in MUs. The whole-body dose equivalent was also affected by collimator rotation, field size, and the energy of the photon beam. Smaller field sizes of low-energy photon beams (that is, 6 MV) with the MLC axis along the lateral axis of the patient resulted in the lowest whole-body dose. Our results can be used to evaluate the risk of secondary malignancies for prostate IMRT patients.",
keywords = "IMRT, Prostate radiation therapy, Secondary malignancies",
author = "Sotirios Stathakis and Jinsheng Li and Ma, {Charlie C M}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "14--27",
journal = "Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics",
issn = "1526-9914",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Monte Carlo determination of radiation-induced cancer risks for prostate patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy

AU - Stathakis, Sotirios

AU - Li, Jinsheng

AU - Ma, Charlie C M

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - The application of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has enabled the delivery of high doses to the target volume while sparing the surrounding normal tissues. The drawbacks of intensity modulation, as implemented using a computer-controlled multileaf collimator (MLC), are the larger number of monitor units (MUs) and longer beam-on time as compared with conventional radiotherapy. Additionally, IMRT uses more beam directions - typically 5-9 for prostate treatment - to achieve highly conformal dose and normal-tissue sparing. In the present work, we study radiation-induced cancer risks attributable to IMRT delivery using MLC for prostate patients. Whole-body computed tomography scans were used in our study to calculate (according to report no. 116 from the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements) the effective dose equivalent received by individual organs. We used EGS4 and MCSIM to compute the dose for IMRT and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. The effects of collimator rotation, distance from the treatment field, and scatter and leakage contribution to the Whole-body dose were investigated. We calculated the whole-body dose equivalent to estimate the increase in the risk of secondary malignancies. Our results showed an overall doubling in the risk of secondary malignancies from the application of IMRT as compared with conventional radiotherapy. This increase in the risk of secondary malignancies is not necessarily related to a relative increase in MUs. The whole-body dose equivalent was also affected by collimator rotation, field size, and the energy of the photon beam. Smaller field sizes of low-energy photon beams (that is, 6 MV) with the MLC axis along the lateral axis of the patient resulted in the lowest whole-body dose. Our results can be used to evaluate the risk of secondary malignancies for prostate IMRT patients.

AB - The application of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has enabled the delivery of high doses to the target volume while sparing the surrounding normal tissues. The drawbacks of intensity modulation, as implemented using a computer-controlled multileaf collimator (MLC), are the larger number of monitor units (MUs) and longer beam-on time as compared with conventional radiotherapy. Additionally, IMRT uses more beam directions - typically 5-9 for prostate treatment - to achieve highly conformal dose and normal-tissue sparing. In the present work, we study radiation-induced cancer risks attributable to IMRT delivery using MLC for prostate patients. Whole-body computed tomography scans were used in our study to calculate (according to report no. 116 from the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements) the effective dose equivalent received by individual organs. We used EGS4 and MCSIM to compute the dose for IMRT and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. The effects of collimator rotation, distance from the treatment field, and scatter and leakage contribution to the Whole-body dose were investigated. We calculated the whole-body dose equivalent to estimate the increase in the risk of secondary malignancies. Our results showed an overall doubling in the risk of secondary malignancies from the application of IMRT as compared with conventional radiotherapy. This increase in the risk of secondary malignancies is not necessarily related to a relative increase in MUs. The whole-body dose equivalent was also affected by collimator rotation, field size, and the energy of the photon beam. Smaller field sizes of low-energy photon beams (that is, 6 MV) with the MLC axis along the lateral axis of the patient resulted in the lowest whole-body dose. Our results can be used to evaluate the risk of secondary malignancies for prostate IMRT patients.

KW - IMRT

KW - Prostate radiation therapy

KW - Secondary malignancies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38049175059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38049175059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 18449157

AN - SCOPUS:38049175059

VL - 8

SP - 14

EP - 27

JO - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

JF - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

SN - 1526-9914

IS - 4

ER -