Abstract
BACKGROUND: Putting evidence into practice at the point of care delivery requires an understanding of implementation strategies that work, in what context and how. OBJECTIVE: To identify methodological issues in implementation science using 4 studies as cases and make recommendations for further methods development. RESEARCH DESIGN: Four cases are presented and methodological issues identified. For each issue raised, evidence on the state of the science is described. RESULTS: Issues in implementation science identified include diverse conceptual frameworks, potential weaknesses in pragmatic study designs, and the paucity of standard concepts and measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations to advance methods in implementation include developing a core set of implementation concepts and metrics, generating standards for implementation methods including pragmatic trials, mixed methods designs, complex interventions and measurement, and endorsing reporting standards for implementation studies.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | S32-S40 |
| Journal | Medical Care |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 4 SUPPL. 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2013 |
Keywords
- context
- implementation science
- methods
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Methodology issues in implementation science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS