Mentorship in academic general internal medicine: Results of a survey of mentors

Sara E. Luckhaupt, Marshall H. Chin, Carol M. Mangione, Russell S. Phillips, Douglas Bell, Anthony C. Leonard, Joel Tsevat

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

57 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective mentorship is crucial to career development. Strategies to improve the availability of mentors include mentoring multiple mentees at once, compensating mentors, comentoring, and long-distance mentoring. OBJECTIVE: To describe current trends in mentorship in general Internal Medicine (GIM). METHODS: We conducted a national cross-sectional web-based survey of GIM mentors, GIM fellowship directors, and GIM National Institutes of Health K24 grant awardees to capture their experiences with mentoring, including compensation for mentorship, multiple mentees, comentorship, and long-distance mentorship. We compared experiences by mentorship funding status, faculty type, academic rank, and sex. RESULTS: We collected data from 111 mentors (77% male, 54% full professors, and 68% clinician-investigators). Fifty-two (47%) received funding for mentorship. Mentors supervised a median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) of 5 (3,8) mentees each, and would be willing to supervise a maximum of 6 (4, 10) mentees at once. Compared with mentors without funding, mentors with funding had more current mentees (mean of 8.3 vs 5.1, respectively; P<.001). Full professors had more current mentees than associate or assistant professors (8.0 vs 5.9 vs 2.4, respectively; P=.005). Ninety-four (85%) mentors had experience comentoring, and two-thirds of mentors had experience mentoring from a distance. Although most mentors found long-distance mentoring to be less demanding, most also said it is less effective for the mentee and is personally less fulfilling. CONCLUSIONS: Mentors in GIM appear to be close to their mentorship capacity, and the majority lack funding for mentorship. Comentoring and long-distance mentoring are common.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1014-1018
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume20
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Education
  • Faculty
  • Internal medicine
  • Medical
  • Mentors
  • Professional

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Mentorship in academic general internal medicine: Results of a survey of mentors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Luckhaupt, S. E., Chin, M. H., Mangione, C. M., Phillips, R. S., Bell, D., Leonard, A. C., & Tsevat, J. (2005). Mentorship in academic general internal medicine: Results of a survey of mentors. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(11), 1014-1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.215.x