Measuring meaning and peace with the facit-spiritual well-being scale

Distinction without a difference?

Amy H. Peterman, Charlie L. Reeve, Eboni C. Winford, Sian Cotton, John M. Salsman, Richard Mcquellon, Joel Tsevat, Cassie Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp; Peterman, Fitchett, Brady, Hernandez, & Cella, 2002) has become a widely used measure of spirituality; however, there remain questions about its specific factor structure and the validity of scores from its separate scales. Specifically, it remains unclear whether the Meaning and Peace scales denote distinct factors. The present study addresses previous limitations by examining the extent to which the Meaning and Peace scales relate differentially to a variety of physical and mental health variables across 4 sets of data from adults with a number of chronic health conditions. Although a model with separate but correlated factors fit the data better, discriminant validity analyses indicated limited differences in the pattern of associations each scale showed with a wide array of commonly used health and quality-of-life measures. In total, the results suggest that people may distinguish between the concepts of Meaning and Peace, but the observed relations with health outcomes are primarily due to variance shared between the 2 factors. Additional research is needed to better understand the separate and joint role of Meaning and Peace in the quality of life of people with chronic illness

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)127-137
Number of pages11
JournalPsychological Assessment
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health
Chronic Disease
Spiritual Therapies
Quality of Life
Spirituality
Discriminant Analysis
Mental Health
Joints
Research
Datasets

Keywords

  • Construct validity
  • Facit-sp
  • Factor analysis
  • Health outcomes
  • Spirituality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Peterman, A. H., Reeve, C. L., Winford, E. C., Cotton, S., Salsman, J. M., Mcquellon, R., ... Campbell, C. (2014). Measuring meaning and peace with the facit-spiritual well-being scale: Distinction without a difference? Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034805

Measuring meaning and peace with the facit-spiritual well-being scale : Distinction without a difference? / Peterman, Amy H.; Reeve, Charlie L.; Winford, Eboni C.; Cotton, Sian; Salsman, John M.; Mcquellon, Richard; Tsevat, Joel; Campbell, Cassie.

In: Psychological Assessment, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 127-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Peterman, AH, Reeve, CL, Winford, EC, Cotton, S, Salsman, JM, Mcquellon, R, Tsevat, J & Campbell, C 2014, 'Measuring meaning and peace with the facit-spiritual well-being scale: Distinction without a difference?', Psychological Assessment, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034805
Peterman, Amy H. ; Reeve, Charlie L. ; Winford, Eboni C. ; Cotton, Sian ; Salsman, John M. ; Mcquellon, Richard ; Tsevat, Joel ; Campbell, Cassie. / Measuring meaning and peace with the facit-spiritual well-being scale : Distinction without a difference?. In: Psychological Assessment. 2014 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 127-137.
@article{97fdf07d8e0d48a2a37f90212e61b87d,
title = "Measuring meaning and peace with the facit-spiritual well-being scale: Distinction without a difference?",
abstract = "The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp; Peterman, Fitchett, Brady, Hernandez, & Cella, 2002) has become a widely used measure of spirituality; however, there remain questions about its specific factor structure and the validity of scores from its separate scales. Specifically, it remains unclear whether the Meaning and Peace scales denote distinct factors. The present study addresses previous limitations by examining the extent to which the Meaning and Peace scales relate differentially to a variety of physical and mental health variables across 4 sets of data from adults with a number of chronic health conditions. Although a model with separate but correlated factors fit the data better, discriminant validity analyses indicated limited differences in the pattern of associations each scale showed with a wide array of commonly used health and quality-of-life measures. In total, the results suggest that people may distinguish between the concepts of Meaning and Peace, but the observed relations with health outcomes are primarily due to variance shared between the 2 factors. Additional research is needed to better understand the separate and joint role of Meaning and Peace in the quality of life of people with chronic illness",
keywords = "Construct validity, Facit-sp, Factor analysis, Health outcomes, Spirituality",
author = "Peterman, {Amy H.} and Reeve, {Charlie L.} and Winford, {Eboni C.} and Sian Cotton and Salsman, {John M.} and Richard Mcquellon and Joel Tsevat and Cassie Campbell",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0034805",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "127--137",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring meaning and peace with the facit-spiritual well-being scale

T2 - Distinction without a difference?

AU - Peterman, Amy H.

AU - Reeve, Charlie L.

AU - Winford, Eboni C.

AU - Cotton, Sian

AU - Salsman, John M.

AU - Mcquellon, Richard

AU - Tsevat, Joel

AU - Campbell, Cassie

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp; Peterman, Fitchett, Brady, Hernandez, & Cella, 2002) has become a widely used measure of spirituality; however, there remain questions about its specific factor structure and the validity of scores from its separate scales. Specifically, it remains unclear whether the Meaning and Peace scales denote distinct factors. The present study addresses previous limitations by examining the extent to which the Meaning and Peace scales relate differentially to a variety of physical and mental health variables across 4 sets of data from adults with a number of chronic health conditions. Although a model with separate but correlated factors fit the data better, discriminant validity analyses indicated limited differences in the pattern of associations each scale showed with a wide array of commonly used health and quality-of-life measures. In total, the results suggest that people may distinguish between the concepts of Meaning and Peace, but the observed relations with health outcomes are primarily due to variance shared between the 2 factors. Additional research is needed to better understand the separate and joint role of Meaning and Peace in the quality of life of people with chronic illness

AB - The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp; Peterman, Fitchett, Brady, Hernandez, & Cella, 2002) has become a widely used measure of spirituality; however, there remain questions about its specific factor structure and the validity of scores from its separate scales. Specifically, it remains unclear whether the Meaning and Peace scales denote distinct factors. The present study addresses previous limitations by examining the extent to which the Meaning and Peace scales relate differentially to a variety of physical and mental health variables across 4 sets of data from adults with a number of chronic health conditions. Although a model with separate but correlated factors fit the data better, discriminant validity analyses indicated limited differences in the pattern of associations each scale showed with a wide array of commonly used health and quality-of-life measures. In total, the results suggest that people may distinguish between the concepts of Meaning and Peace, but the observed relations with health outcomes are primarily due to variance shared between the 2 factors. Additional research is needed to better understand the separate and joint role of Meaning and Peace in the quality of life of people with chronic illness

KW - Construct validity

KW - Facit-sp

KW - Factor analysis

KW - Health outcomes

KW - Spirituality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896734730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896734730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0034805

DO - 10.1037/a0034805

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 127

EP - 137

JO - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

IS - 1

ER -