TY - JOUR
T1 - Measurement validity of the low vision independence measure (LVIM)
AU - Smith, Theresa M.
AU - Krishnan, Shilpa
AU - Hong, Ickpyo
AU - Reistetter, Timothy A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - OBJECTIVE. This study's objective was to test the psychometrics of Smith's (2013) Low Vision Independence Measure (LVIM) using the Rasch model. METHOD. A cohort design was used with 93 participants receiving occupational therapy for low vision. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with a parceling approach was used to test the LVIM factors and Rasch analysis to examine item-level psychometrics. RESULTS. Participants' average age was 78.9 yr (standard deviation = 12.1), and the majority were female (72.8%) with macular degeneration (62.3%). The CFA revealed two measurement factors: visual field or scotoma (n = 28) and visual acuity (n = 24). We removed six misfitting items, and the two factors of the revised LVIM demonstrated good rating scale function, good internal consistency (person reliability: visual field, .87; visual acuity, .90), good precision (person strata: visual field, 3.91; visual acuity, 4.40), no ceiling or floor effects, and no differential item functioning. CONCLUSION. The revised LVIMdemonstrates good psychometrics on the Rasch model and can be used as a valid outcome measure in low vision rehabilitation.
AB - OBJECTIVE. This study's objective was to test the psychometrics of Smith's (2013) Low Vision Independence Measure (LVIM) using the Rasch model. METHOD. A cohort design was used with 93 participants receiving occupational therapy for low vision. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with a parceling approach was used to test the LVIM factors and Rasch analysis to examine item-level psychometrics. RESULTS. Participants' average age was 78.9 yr (standard deviation = 12.1), and the majority were female (72.8%) with macular degeneration (62.3%). The CFA revealed two measurement factors: visual field or scotoma (n = 28) and visual acuity (n = 24). We removed six misfitting items, and the two factors of the revised LVIM demonstrated good rating scale function, good internal consistency (person reliability: visual field, .87; visual acuity, .90), good precision (person strata: visual field, 3.91; visual acuity, 4.40), no ceiling or floor effects, and no differential item functioning. CONCLUSION. The revised LVIMdemonstrates good psychometrics on the Rasch model and can be used as a valid outcome measure in low vision rehabilitation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066856579&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066856579&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5014/ajot.2019.031070
DO - 10.5014/ajot.2019.031070
M3 - Article
C2 - 31120837
AN - SCOPUS:85066856579
SN - 0272-9490
VL - 73
JO - American Journal of Occupational Therapy
JF - American Journal of Occupational Therapy
IS - 3
M1 - 205070p1
ER -