TY - JOUR
T1 - Measurement of psychiatric treatment adherence
AU - Sajatovic, Martha
AU - Velligan, Dawn I.
AU - Weiden, Peter J.
AU - Valenstein, Marcia A.
AU - Ogedegbe, Gbenga
N1 - Funding Information:
This article is based in part on an NIMH supported meeting on “Methodological Challenges in Psychiatric Treatment Adherence Research” held last September 27–28, 2007, and is supported in part by Grants NIMH R34 MH078967 and NIMH K23 MH0655997 (Dr. Sajatovic). Dr. Ogedege was supported in part by NIH grants: R01 HL078566 and R03 TW007452.
PY - 2010/12
Y1 - 2010/12
N2 - Objective: Nonadherence to medications for mental disorders substantially limits treatment effectiveness and results in higher rates of relapse, hospitalization, and disability. Accurate measurement of medication adherence is important not only in adherence research but also in clinical trials in which medications are being evaluated and in clinical practice where failure to detect nonadherence results in premature medication changes, unnecessary polypharmacy, and greater likelihoods of functional deteriorations and hospitalizations. This is a review of psychiatric treatment adherence methods and measures arising from a meeting on "Methodological Challenges in Psychiatric Treatment Adherence Research" held on September 27-28, 2007, in Bethesda, MD, and organized by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Methods: This paper reviews the range of modalities currently available for assessing adherence behavior including pill counts, pharmacy records, technology-assisted monitoring, biological assays, and a range of self-report and interviewer-rated scales. Measures of adherence attitudes are also reviewed. Results: Each of the adherence measures described are imperfect estimates of actual medication ingestion, but each provides informative estimates of adherence or the attitudinal factors associated with adherence. Measure selection depends on a range of factors including the patient sample, the context in which the measure is being used, and the clinical outcomes expected from various levels of nonadherence. The use of multiple measures of adherence is encouraged to balance the limitations of individual measures. Conclusion: While adherence assessment has become increasingly sophisticated in recent years, there remains a need for refinement and expansion on currently available methods and measures.
AB - Objective: Nonadherence to medications for mental disorders substantially limits treatment effectiveness and results in higher rates of relapse, hospitalization, and disability. Accurate measurement of medication adherence is important not only in adherence research but also in clinical trials in which medications are being evaluated and in clinical practice where failure to detect nonadherence results in premature medication changes, unnecessary polypharmacy, and greater likelihoods of functional deteriorations and hospitalizations. This is a review of psychiatric treatment adherence methods and measures arising from a meeting on "Methodological Challenges in Psychiatric Treatment Adherence Research" held on September 27-28, 2007, in Bethesda, MD, and organized by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Methods: This paper reviews the range of modalities currently available for assessing adherence behavior including pill counts, pharmacy records, technology-assisted monitoring, biological assays, and a range of self-report and interviewer-rated scales. Measures of adherence attitudes are also reviewed. Results: Each of the adherence measures described are imperfect estimates of actual medication ingestion, but each provides informative estimates of adherence or the attitudinal factors associated with adherence. Measure selection depends on a range of factors including the patient sample, the context in which the measure is being used, and the clinical outcomes expected from various levels of nonadherence. The use of multiple measures of adherence is encouraged to balance the limitations of individual measures. Conclusion: While adherence assessment has become increasingly sophisticated in recent years, there remains a need for refinement and expansion on currently available methods and measures.
KW - Adherence
KW - Assessment
KW - Compliance
KW - Measurement
KW - Outcomes
KW - Self-report
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649444352&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649444352&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.05.007
DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.05.007
M3 - Review article
C2 - 21109048
AN - SCOPUS:78649444352
SN - 0022-3999
VL - 69
SP - 591
EP - 599
JO - Journal of Psychosomatic Research
JF - Journal of Psychosomatic Research
IS - 6
ER -