Managing expectations when publishing tools and methods for computational proteomics

Lennart Martens, Oliver Kohlbacher, Susan E Weintraub

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Computational tools are pivotal in proteomics because they are crucial for identification, quantification, and statistical assessment of data. The gateway to finding the best choice of a tool or approach for a particular problem is frequently journal articles, yet there is often an overwhelming variety of options that makes it hard to decide on the best solution. This is particularly difficult for nonexperts in bioinformatics. The maturity, reliability, and performance of tools can vary widely because publications may appear at different stages of development. A novel idea might merit early publication despite only offering proof-of-principle, while it may take years before a tool can be considered mature, and by that time it might be difficult for a new publication to be accepted because of a perceived lack of novelty. After discussions with members of the computational mass spectrometry community, we describe here proposed recommendations for organization of informatics manuscripts as a way to set the expectations of readers (and reviewers) through three different manuscript types that are based on existing journal designations. Brief Communications are short reports describing novel computational approaches where the implementation is not necessarily production-ready. Research Articles present both a novel idea and mature implementation that has been suitably benchmarked. Application Notes focus on a mature and tested tool or concept and need not be novel but should offer advancement from improved quality, ease of use, and/or implementation. Organizing computational proteomics contributions into these three manuscript types will facilitate the review process and will also enable readers to identify the maturity and applicability of the tool for their own workflows.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2002-2004
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Proteome Research
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Manuscripts
Proteomics
Informatics
Workflow
Computational Biology
Publications
Mass Spectrometry
Bioinformatics
Research
Mass spectrometry
Communication

Keywords

  • bioinformatics
  • computational mass spectrometry
  • manuscript types

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Chemistry(all)

Cite this

Managing expectations when publishing tools and methods for computational proteomics. / Martens, Lennart; Kohlbacher, Oliver; Weintraub, Susan E.

In: Journal of Proteome Research, Vol. 14, No. 5, 01.05.2015, p. 2002-2004.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f5a190be15cb424e955c1a74b1d9fb99,
title = "Managing expectations when publishing tools and methods for computational proteomics",
abstract = "Computational tools are pivotal in proteomics because they are crucial for identification, quantification, and statistical assessment of data. The gateway to finding the best choice of a tool or approach for a particular problem is frequently journal articles, yet there is often an overwhelming variety of options that makes it hard to decide on the best solution. This is particularly difficult for nonexperts in bioinformatics. The maturity, reliability, and performance of tools can vary widely because publications may appear at different stages of development. A novel idea might merit early publication despite only offering proof-of-principle, while it may take years before a tool can be considered mature, and by that time it might be difficult for a new publication to be accepted because of a perceived lack of novelty. After discussions with members of the computational mass spectrometry community, we describe here proposed recommendations for organization of informatics manuscripts as a way to set the expectations of readers (and reviewers) through three different manuscript types that are based on existing journal designations. Brief Communications are short reports describing novel computational approaches where the implementation is not necessarily production-ready. Research Articles present both a novel idea and mature implementation that has been suitably benchmarked. Application Notes focus on a mature and tested tool or concept and need not be novel but should offer advancement from improved quality, ease of use, and/or implementation. Organizing computational proteomics contributions into these three manuscript types will facilitate the review process and will also enable readers to identify the maturity and applicability of the tool for their own workflows.",
keywords = "bioinformatics, computational mass spectrometry, manuscript types",
author = "Lennart Martens and Oliver Kohlbacher and Weintraub, {Susan E}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1021/pr501318d",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "2002--2004",
journal = "Journal of Proteome Research",
issn = "1535-3893",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing expectations when publishing tools and methods for computational proteomics

AU - Martens, Lennart

AU - Kohlbacher, Oliver

AU - Weintraub, Susan E

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Computational tools are pivotal in proteomics because they are crucial for identification, quantification, and statistical assessment of data. The gateway to finding the best choice of a tool or approach for a particular problem is frequently journal articles, yet there is often an overwhelming variety of options that makes it hard to decide on the best solution. This is particularly difficult for nonexperts in bioinformatics. The maturity, reliability, and performance of tools can vary widely because publications may appear at different stages of development. A novel idea might merit early publication despite only offering proof-of-principle, while it may take years before a tool can be considered mature, and by that time it might be difficult for a new publication to be accepted because of a perceived lack of novelty. After discussions with members of the computational mass spectrometry community, we describe here proposed recommendations for organization of informatics manuscripts as a way to set the expectations of readers (and reviewers) through three different manuscript types that are based on existing journal designations. Brief Communications are short reports describing novel computational approaches where the implementation is not necessarily production-ready. Research Articles present both a novel idea and mature implementation that has been suitably benchmarked. Application Notes focus on a mature and tested tool or concept and need not be novel but should offer advancement from improved quality, ease of use, and/or implementation. Organizing computational proteomics contributions into these three manuscript types will facilitate the review process and will also enable readers to identify the maturity and applicability of the tool for their own workflows.

AB - Computational tools are pivotal in proteomics because they are crucial for identification, quantification, and statistical assessment of data. The gateway to finding the best choice of a tool or approach for a particular problem is frequently journal articles, yet there is often an overwhelming variety of options that makes it hard to decide on the best solution. This is particularly difficult for nonexperts in bioinformatics. The maturity, reliability, and performance of tools can vary widely because publications may appear at different stages of development. A novel idea might merit early publication despite only offering proof-of-principle, while it may take years before a tool can be considered mature, and by that time it might be difficult for a new publication to be accepted because of a perceived lack of novelty. After discussions with members of the computational mass spectrometry community, we describe here proposed recommendations for organization of informatics manuscripts as a way to set the expectations of readers (and reviewers) through three different manuscript types that are based on existing journal designations. Brief Communications are short reports describing novel computational approaches where the implementation is not necessarily production-ready. Research Articles present both a novel idea and mature implementation that has been suitably benchmarked. Application Notes focus on a mature and tested tool or concept and need not be novel but should offer advancement from improved quality, ease of use, and/or implementation. Organizing computational proteomics contributions into these three manuscript types will facilitate the review process and will also enable readers to identify the maturity and applicability of the tool for their own workflows.

KW - bioinformatics

KW - computational mass spectrometry

KW - manuscript types

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929660072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929660072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/pr501318d

DO - 10.1021/pr501318d

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 2002

EP - 2004

JO - Journal of Proteome Research

JF - Journal of Proteome Research

SN - 1535-3893

IS - 5

ER -