Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of High Grade Cancer in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study

Michael A. Liss, Lisa F. Newcomb, Yingye Zheng, Michael P. Garcia, Christopher P. Filson, Hilary Boyer, James D. Brooks, Peter R. Carroll, Matthew R. Cooperberg, William J. Ellis, Martin E. Gleave, Frances M. Martin, Todd Morgan, Peter S. Nelson, Andrew A. Wagner, Ian M. Thompson, Daniel W. Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose:We investigated the ability of prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason Grade Group 2 or greater cancer in a standardized, multi-institutional active surveillance cohort.Materials and Methods:We evaluated men enrolled in Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study with Gleason Grade Group less than 2 and who underwent biopsy within 12 months of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Our primary outcome was biopsy reclassification to Gleason Grade Group 2 or greater. We evaluated the performance of magnetic resonance imaging PI-RADS score and clinical factors. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit with magnetic resonance imaging and clinical factors and used to perform receiver operating curve analyses.Results:There were 361 participants with 395 prostate magnetic resonance imaging studies with a median followup of 4.1 (IQR 2.0-7.6) years. Overall 108 (27%) biopsies showed reclassification. Defining positive magnetic resonance imaging as PI-RADS 3-5, the negative predictive value and positive predictive value for detecting Gleason Grade Group 2 or greater cancer was 83% (95% CI 76-90) and 31% (95% CI 26-37), respectively. PI-RADS was significantly associated with reclassification (PI-RADS 5 vs 1 and 2 OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.21-6.17, p=0.016) in a multivariable model but did not improve upon a model with only clinical factors (AUC 0.768 vs 0.762). In 194 fusion biopsies higher grade cancer was found in targeted cores in 21 (11%) instances, while 25 (13%) had higher grade cancer in the systematic cores.Conclusions:This study adds the largest cohort data to the body of literature for magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance, recommending systematic biopsy in patients with negative magnetic resonance imaging and the inclusion of systematic biopsy in patients with positive magnetic resonance imaging.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)701-706
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume204
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2020

Keywords

  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • prostatic neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of High Grade Cancer in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this