Limitations of the metabolic rate meter for measuring oxygen consumption and cardiac output

Richard A. Lange, Gregory J. Dehmer, Peter J. Wells, David A. Tate, Avanindra Jain, Eduardo D. Flores, Timothy C. Nichols, L. David Hillis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the past few years, a metabolic rate meter has been introduced for easy measurement of oxygen consumption. However, its accuracy is unproved. In 40 patients (26 men, 14 women, ages 34 to 73 years), cardiac output was measured simultaneously by thermodilution and the Fick method using the metabolic rate meter to quantitate oxygen consumption. In comparison with thermodilution, the results using the Fick method were low (5.26 ± 1.18 vs 4.14 ± 0.99 liters/min, respectively, p < 0.01). In 18 patients cardiac output also was measured by the Fick method using a Douglas bag to quantitate oxygen consumption. In these patients, oxygen consumption measured with the metaboic rate meter was lower than that obtained using the Douglas bag (168 ± 25 vs 216 ± 42 ml/ min, respectively, p < 0.01). With the Douglas bag, the Fick and thermodilution cardiac output measurements were similar (4.68 ± 1.08 vs 4.87 ± 0.86 liters/min, respectively, difference not significant), and they differed by ≤ 10% in 15 patients. In contrast, with the metabolic rate meter, the results of thermdilution were higher than those with the Fick method (4.84 ± 0.95 vs 3.60 ± 0.71 liters/ min, respectively, p < 0.01), and differed by ≤ 10% in only 1 patient (p < 0.01). Thus, the values for oxygen consumption and cardiac output obtained with the metabolic rate meter are lower than actual values. This device is less accurate than the Douglas bag.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)783-786
Number of pages4
JournalThe American Journal of Cardiology
Volume64
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Oxygen Consumption
Cardiac Output
Thermodilution
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Lange, R. A., Dehmer, G. J., Wells, P. J., Tate, D. A., Jain, A., Flores, E. D., ... Hillis, L. D. (1989). Limitations of the metabolic rate meter for measuring oxygen consumption and cardiac output. The American Journal of Cardiology, 64(12), 783-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(89)90765-0

Limitations of the metabolic rate meter for measuring oxygen consumption and cardiac output. / Lange, Richard A.; Dehmer, Gregory J.; Wells, Peter J.; Tate, David A.; Jain, Avanindra; Flores, Eduardo D.; Nichols, Timothy C.; Hillis, L. David.

In: The American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 64, No. 12, 01.10.1989, p. 783-786.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lange, RA, Dehmer, GJ, Wells, PJ, Tate, DA, Jain, A, Flores, ED, Nichols, TC & Hillis, LD 1989, 'Limitations of the metabolic rate meter for measuring oxygen consumption and cardiac output', The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 783-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(89)90765-0
Lange, Richard A. ; Dehmer, Gregory J. ; Wells, Peter J. ; Tate, David A. ; Jain, Avanindra ; Flores, Eduardo D. ; Nichols, Timothy C. ; Hillis, L. David. / Limitations of the metabolic rate meter for measuring oxygen consumption and cardiac output. In: The American Journal of Cardiology. 1989 ; Vol. 64, No. 12. pp. 783-786.
@article{3069774eb64e4975982f1c8dab35d8ba,
title = "Limitations of the metabolic rate meter for measuring oxygen consumption and cardiac output",
abstract = "Over the past few years, a metabolic rate meter has been introduced for easy measurement of oxygen consumption. However, its accuracy is unproved. In 40 patients (26 men, 14 women, ages 34 to 73 years), cardiac output was measured simultaneously by thermodilution and the Fick method using the metabolic rate meter to quantitate oxygen consumption. In comparison with thermodilution, the results using the Fick method were low (5.26 ± 1.18 vs 4.14 ± 0.99 liters/min, respectively, p < 0.01). In 18 patients cardiac output also was measured by the Fick method using a Douglas bag to quantitate oxygen consumption. In these patients, oxygen consumption measured with the metaboic rate meter was lower than that obtained using the Douglas bag (168 ± 25 vs 216 ± 42 ml/ min, respectively, p < 0.01). With the Douglas bag, the Fick and thermodilution cardiac output measurements were similar (4.68 ± 1.08 vs 4.87 ± 0.86 liters/min, respectively, difference not significant), and they differed by ≤ 10{\%} in 15 patients. In contrast, with the metabolic rate meter, the results of thermdilution were higher than those with the Fick method (4.84 ± 0.95 vs 3.60 ± 0.71 liters/ min, respectively, p < 0.01), and differed by ≤ 10{\%} in only 1 patient (p < 0.01). Thus, the values for oxygen consumption and cardiac output obtained with the metabolic rate meter are lower than actual values. This device is less accurate than the Douglas bag.",
author = "Lange, {Richard A.} and Dehmer, {Gregory J.} and Wells, {Peter J.} and Tate, {David A.} and Avanindra Jain and Flores, {Eduardo D.} and Nichols, {Timothy C.} and Hillis, {L. David}",
year = "1989",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9149(89)90765-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "783--786",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limitations of the metabolic rate meter for measuring oxygen consumption and cardiac output

AU - Lange, Richard A.

AU - Dehmer, Gregory J.

AU - Wells, Peter J.

AU - Tate, David A.

AU - Jain, Avanindra

AU - Flores, Eduardo D.

AU - Nichols, Timothy C.

AU - Hillis, L. David

PY - 1989/10/1

Y1 - 1989/10/1

N2 - Over the past few years, a metabolic rate meter has been introduced for easy measurement of oxygen consumption. However, its accuracy is unproved. In 40 patients (26 men, 14 women, ages 34 to 73 years), cardiac output was measured simultaneously by thermodilution and the Fick method using the metabolic rate meter to quantitate oxygen consumption. In comparison with thermodilution, the results using the Fick method were low (5.26 ± 1.18 vs 4.14 ± 0.99 liters/min, respectively, p < 0.01). In 18 patients cardiac output also was measured by the Fick method using a Douglas bag to quantitate oxygen consumption. In these patients, oxygen consumption measured with the metaboic rate meter was lower than that obtained using the Douglas bag (168 ± 25 vs 216 ± 42 ml/ min, respectively, p < 0.01). With the Douglas bag, the Fick and thermodilution cardiac output measurements were similar (4.68 ± 1.08 vs 4.87 ± 0.86 liters/min, respectively, difference not significant), and they differed by ≤ 10% in 15 patients. In contrast, with the metabolic rate meter, the results of thermdilution were higher than those with the Fick method (4.84 ± 0.95 vs 3.60 ± 0.71 liters/ min, respectively, p < 0.01), and differed by ≤ 10% in only 1 patient (p < 0.01). Thus, the values for oxygen consumption and cardiac output obtained with the metabolic rate meter are lower than actual values. This device is less accurate than the Douglas bag.

AB - Over the past few years, a metabolic rate meter has been introduced for easy measurement of oxygen consumption. However, its accuracy is unproved. In 40 patients (26 men, 14 women, ages 34 to 73 years), cardiac output was measured simultaneously by thermodilution and the Fick method using the metabolic rate meter to quantitate oxygen consumption. In comparison with thermodilution, the results using the Fick method were low (5.26 ± 1.18 vs 4.14 ± 0.99 liters/min, respectively, p < 0.01). In 18 patients cardiac output also was measured by the Fick method using a Douglas bag to quantitate oxygen consumption. In these patients, oxygen consumption measured with the metaboic rate meter was lower than that obtained using the Douglas bag (168 ± 25 vs 216 ± 42 ml/ min, respectively, p < 0.01). With the Douglas bag, the Fick and thermodilution cardiac output measurements were similar (4.68 ± 1.08 vs 4.87 ± 0.86 liters/min, respectively, difference not significant), and they differed by ≤ 10% in 15 patients. In contrast, with the metabolic rate meter, the results of thermdilution were higher than those with the Fick method (4.84 ± 0.95 vs 3.60 ± 0.71 liters/ min, respectively, p < 0.01), and differed by ≤ 10% in only 1 patient (p < 0.01). Thus, the values for oxygen consumption and cardiac output obtained with the metabolic rate meter are lower than actual values. This device is less accurate than the Douglas bag.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024418130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024418130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90765-0

DO - 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90765-0

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 783

EP - 786

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 12

ER -