Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ligand Design for Securing Ferromagnetic Exchange Coupling in Multimetallic Complexes

  • Scott W. Gordon‐Wylie
  • , Emile L. Bominaar
  • , Terrence J. Collins
  • , José M. Workman
  • , Brian L. Claus
  • , Robert E. Patterson
  • , Stacy A. Williams
  • , Brenda J. Conklin
  • , Gordon T. Yee
  • , Susan E Weintraub

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

An approach is suggested for using ligands to control exchange coupling in multinuclear ions. The idea arose from structural, EPR, and magnetic studies of [PPh4]3 (Scheme 1). Ferromagnetic coupling has been found between the CoII and each CoIII in 3 with J = −22 ± 5 cm−1 (JS1 · S2). It is suggested that dominant antiferromagnetic superexchange is absent because of the strong σ‐donor capacity of the tetradentate ligand [k4‐PAC*]4− (Fig. 1). The ligand interacts at CoIII primarily with a single d orbital; it is thus best able to participate in superexchange. The interaction makes the unique d orbital strongly σ‐antibonding and empty for each d6, S = 1, CoIII ion in 3, that is, unavailable for antiferromagnetic coupling, but available for ferromagnetic pathways by a Goodenough‐Kanamori mechanism. By corollary, when any [k4‐PAC*]4−‐type ligand with any magnetic ion Ma in the tetradentate site binds any magnetic ion Mb in the bidentate site, ferromagnetic coupling should be favored provided Ma is not a d9 ion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)528-537
Number of pages10
JournalChemistry – A European Journal
Volume1
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1995

Keywords

  • exchange coupling
  • ferromagnetic properties
  • ligand design
  • magnetic properties
  • multimetallic complexes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Catalysis
  • Organic Chemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ligand Design for Securing Ferromagnetic Exchange Coupling in Multimetallic Complexes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this