TY - JOUR
T1 - Laser-Doppler measurement of skin blood flow
T2 - Comparison with plethysmography
AU - Johnson, J. M.
AU - Taylor, W. F.
AU - Shepherd, A. P.
AU - Park, M. K.
PY - 1984
Y1 - 1984
N2 - We compared laser-Doppler velocimetry with plethysmographically determined changes in skin blood flow (SkBF) in five studies on four men. Increments in SkBF were induced by raising whole-body skin temperature to 39°C for 50-70 min. We found laser-Doppler blood flow (LDF) to correlate well with total forearm blood flow (FBF) within each study (r = 0.94-0.98), but the relationship varied among studies. Thus the slopes for the LDF vs. FBF relationship varied from 40 to 122 mV·ml-1·100 ml·min. The value for LDF at zero FBF, extrapolated from the regression relationships, ranged from 246 to 599 mV above the value for LDF set with the probe on a stationary object. The value for LDF when blood flow to the arm was mechanically occluded ranged from 110 to 230 mV. In a second series, we measured the LDF values from six sites on forearms of each of four normothermic men. There was a marked regional variation, with 1.8- to 5.7-fold ranges in LDF within a given subject. Values for LDF during occlusion of the forearm were more consistent within and between subjects. Thus LDF appears to provide a good indicator of the response pattern of SkBF from the region of illuminated skin. However, variability in the relationship to total SkBF (probably arising from variation in the number of perfused capillaries in the small volume of tissue) and uncertainties in the value of LDF at zero SkBF make quantitative use difficult.
AB - We compared laser-Doppler velocimetry with plethysmographically determined changes in skin blood flow (SkBF) in five studies on four men. Increments in SkBF were induced by raising whole-body skin temperature to 39°C for 50-70 min. We found laser-Doppler blood flow (LDF) to correlate well with total forearm blood flow (FBF) within each study (r = 0.94-0.98), but the relationship varied among studies. Thus the slopes for the LDF vs. FBF relationship varied from 40 to 122 mV·ml-1·100 ml·min. The value for LDF at zero FBF, extrapolated from the regression relationships, ranged from 246 to 599 mV above the value for LDF set with the probe on a stationary object. The value for LDF when blood flow to the arm was mechanically occluded ranged from 110 to 230 mV. In a second series, we measured the LDF values from six sites on forearms of each of four normothermic men. There was a marked regional variation, with 1.8- to 5.7-fold ranges in LDF within a given subject. Values for LDF during occlusion of the forearm were more consistent within and between subjects. Thus LDF appears to provide a good indicator of the response pattern of SkBF from the region of illuminated skin. However, variability in the relationship to total SkBF (probably arising from variation in the number of perfused capillaries in the small volume of tissue) and uncertainties in the value of LDF at zero SkBF make quantitative use difficult.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021336630&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021336630&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1152/jappl.1984.56.3.798
DO - 10.1152/jappl.1984.56.3.798
M3 - Article
C2 - 6706783
AN - SCOPUS:0021336630
SN - 0161-7567
VL - 56
SP - 798
EP - 803
JO - Journal of Applied Physiology
JF - Journal of Applied Physiology
IS - 3
ER -