Laser-Doppler measurement of skin blood flow: Comparison with plethysmography

J. M. Johnson, W. F. Taylor, A. P. Shepherd, M. K. Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

247 Scopus citations

Abstract

We compared laser-Doppler velocimetry with plethysmographically determined changes in skin blood flow (SkBF) in five studies on four men. Increments in SkBF were induced by raising whole-body skin temperature to 39°C for 50-70 min. We found laser-Doppler blood flow (LDF) to correlate well with total forearm blood flow (FBF) within each study (r = 0.94-0.98), but the relationship varied among studies. Thus the slopes for the LDF vs. FBF relationship varied from 40 to 122 mV·ml-1·100 ml·min. The value for LDF at zero FBF, extrapolated from the regression relationships, ranged from 246 to 599 mV above the value for LDF set with the probe on a stationary object. The value for LDF when blood flow to the arm was mechanically occluded ranged from 110 to 230 mV. In a second series, we measured the LDF values from six sites on forearms of each of four normothermic men. There was a marked regional variation, with 1.8- to 5.7-fold ranges in LDF within a given subject. Values for LDF during occlusion of the forearm were more consistent within and between subjects. Thus LDF appears to provide a good indicator of the response pattern of SkBF from the region of illuminated skin. However, variability in the relationship to total SkBF (probably arising from variation in the number of perfused capillaries in the small volume of tissue) and uncertainties in the value of LDF at zero SkBF make quantitative use difficult.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)798-803
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology Respiratory Environmental and Exercise Physiology
Volume56
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Endocrinology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Laser-Doppler measurement of skin blood flow: Comparison with plethysmography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this