Abstract
Background: The role of frozen section (FS) in thyroid disease is controversial. The goal of this study was to identify a cohort of patients who may or may not benefit from FS. Methods: Two hundred thirty-one patients who underwent thyroidectomy were evaluated in regard to fine-needle aspiration (FNA), FS, and the extent of surgery. Results: In all, 155 patients underwent FNA, 140 patients underwent FS, and 103 patients had both. A final diagnosis of malignancy was obtained in 47 of 231 patients. FNA had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 99%, and FS had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 100% for diagnosing malignancy. Accounting for the clinical findings and FNA results, FS results altered the extent of thyroidectomy in 1 of 103 patients. Conclusions: The increased costs for the operative time and the pathologists needed to obtain routine FS are not supported with any substantial benefit in patient outcome.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 510-514 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | American journal of surgery |
| Volume | 184 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1 2002 |
Keywords
- Fine-needle aspiration
- Frozen section
- Thyroid
- Thyroidectomy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is thyroid frozen section too much for too little?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS